You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I searched issues and couldn’t find anything (or linked relevant results below)
Problem
No one person can belong to all racial groups.
This means that no one person can objectively determine how offensive a word is.
Tier ranking how offensive one racial epithet over another seems like a slippery slope to the type of problem this project purports to be trying to solve
Solution
All racial epithets should be in this package. They're an equality issue, not a profanity issue. They should all be considered at the same level and as one evil.
Alternatives
Write supporting documentation which details the thought process behind the tier ranking of each racial epithet. I suspect this won't be pretty.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is vague and not actionable, hence it can't be solved. Consider defining what these so called missing racial epithets are, and proposing that specifically.
This issue is vague and not actionable, hence it can't be solved. Consider defining what these so called missing racial epithets are, and proposing that specifically.
Initial checklist
Problem
No one person can belong to all racial groups.
This means that no one person can objectively determine how offensive a word is.
Tier ranking how offensive one racial epithet over another seems like a slippery slope to the type of problem this project purports to be trying to solve
Solution
All racial epithets should be in this package. They're an equality issue, not a profanity issue. They should all be considered at the same level and as one evil.
Alternatives
Write supporting documentation which details the thought process behind the tier ranking of each racial epithet. I suspect this won't be pretty.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: