Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redefine rws bit field type #184

Closed
taichi-ishitani opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Redefine rws bit field type #184

taichi-ishitani opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@taichi-ishitani
Copy link
Member

The set signal of rws bit field type acts as a hw write port and this behavior is not matched with other xxs bit field types.
Therefore, bit field value of rws should also be set to 1 like other xxs bit field types.

To do this change, the bit field types below should be renamed.
(hw means hardware write.)

  • rws -> rwhw
  • rol -> rohw
taichi-ishitani added a commit to rggen/rggen-default-register-map that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2024
* rename bit field types

* rol -> rohw
* rws -> rwhw

* redefine rws bit field type
taichi-ishitani added a commit to rggen/rggen-sample that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2024
* rol -> rohw
* rws -> rwhw

(refs: rggen/rggen#184)
taichi-ishitani added a commit to rggen/rggen-sample that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2024
taichi-ishitani added a commit to rggen/rggen-systemverilog that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2024
* rename bit field types

* rol -> rohw
* rws -> rwhw

* redefine rws bit field type
taichi-ishitani added a commit to rggen/rggen-verilog that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2024
* rename bit field type name

* rol -> rohw
* rws -> rwhw

* redefine rws bit field type
taichi-ishitani added a commit to rggen/rggen-vhdl that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2024
* rename bit field type name

* rol -> rohw
* rws -> rwhw

* redefine rws bit field type
taichi-ishitani added a commit to rggen/rggen-sample-testbench that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant