Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2020. It is now read-only.

Should the package definitions be part of YANG library? #10

Closed
rgwilton opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Should the package definitions be part of YANG library? #10

rgwilton opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@rgwilton
Copy link
Owner

Should the YANG package definitions be part of YANG library, or should they be contained in their own top level "packages" container?

The advantages of them being part of YANG library is that fetching the YANG library information retrieves all of the packages at the same time. However, given that one of the aims of packages is that they are available off the box, then this doesn't seem to be so useful, and perhaps would end up being a hindrance.

@rgwilton
Copy link
Owner Author

I think that this issue is effectively the same as #12.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant