Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

smart contract on chain licensing #28

Closed
brandondees opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

smart contract on chain licensing #28

brandondees opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@brandondees
Copy link
Contributor

smart contracts deployed to public networks (including testnets) should specify source code licenses using the standard comment annotation format

smart contracts deployed to public networks (including testnets) should also specify the product usage and NFT content licenses that are relevant. see https://github.com/a16z/a16z-contracts

refer to product decisions for the specific licenses to specify

@brandondees brandondees added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 30, 2023
@brandondees
Copy link
Contributor Author

probably also a good idea to have the web app point to these somewhere

@brandondees brandondees mentioned this issue Jun 30, 2023
2 tasks
@paigel
Copy link
Contributor

paigel commented Jul 14, 2023

closing while we remove minting for now

@paigel paigel closed this as completed Jul 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants