Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Window not compatible with modern resolution #28

Open
Redsandro opened this issue Mar 20, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Window not compatible with modern resolution #28

Redsandro opened this issue Mar 20, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@Redsandro
Copy link

Redsandro commented Mar 20, 2018

These days I can't find a modern media computer around with a resolution below 4K anymore.

But the window is still in the same pixel size, effectively dividing the window surface by 4:

image

This is on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. The title bar is the normal window font size.

Admittedly, this is qjackctl version 0.4.2 build apr 7 2016 21:23:34. I see a lot of work has been done since. This version comes default from the Ubuntu repositories. This might have been solved already. I'm not sure where I can go to suggest a backport of said improvement, if it exists. I also suspect Ubuntu LTS people will start upgrading in the summer, hopefully getting a newer version of qjackctl.

@rncbc
Copy link
Owner

rncbc commented Mar 20, 2018

what is really the problem here? no, there is no change re. hidpi on the qjackctl front, at least from this side, sorry.

anyway a PR would be welcome on that regard ;)
cheers

@Redsandro
Copy link
Author

what is really the problem here?

The problem is that the window is small, and it's hard to press one single button on a touch-screen without touching multiple buttons at the same time.

As Dereck Zoolander once said:

image

"It has to be at least... three times bigger than this!"

no, there is no change re. hidpi on the qjackctl front

Ok gotcha. So I'm correct to create an issue in the issue tracker, even though I've tested on an older version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants