You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are trying to use it on one of our application and facing issue with one of the scenario.
When a sub task calendar days are increased then, the calendar days of main task increases automatically. But when the same sub task days are reduced the days of main task are not reducing automatically - it reduces only when we manually drag the gantt bar of main task.
Can you please help us and let us know if we are missing anything in implementation.
Thanks for the help in advance.
Regards,
Nidhi Sarvaiya
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When a sub task calendar days are increased then, the calendar days of
main task increases automatically. But when the same sub task days are
reduced the days of main task are not reducing automatically - it reduces
only when we manually drag the gantt bar of main task.
Can you please help us and let us know if we are missing anything in
implementation.
This is the standard behavior in our model; parent task can be wider of
their children.
Cheers,
Roberto
*Ing. Roberto Bicchierai - *Development Team Director rbicchierai@open-lab.com blog: roberto.open-lab.com
open lab s.r.l.
via venezia 18b 50121 firenze italia
Tel: +39 055 5522779
Can you please guide us on event which we need to refer to customize for our requirement to update parent task date automatically on updating children.
Hello,
Thanks for such a good component.
We are trying to use it on one of our application and facing issue with one of the scenario.
When a sub task calendar days are increased then, the calendar days of main task increases automatically. But when the same sub task days are reduced the days of main task are not reducing automatically - it reduces only when we manually drag the gantt bar of main task.
Can you please help us and let us know if we are missing anything in implementation.
Thanks for the help in advance.
Regards,
Nidhi Sarvaiya
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: