Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move ropensci image from rocker repo? #30

Closed
cboettig opened this issue Oct 10, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

move ropensci image from rocker repo? #30

cboettig opened this issue Oct 10, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@cboettig
Copy link
Member

@eddelbuettel Taking a quick look at updating the README and feeling like the ropensci repo doesn't fit as nicely within our scope as the other projects do. Thinking about making it's permanent home be https://github.com/ropensci/docker and http://hub.docker.com/ropensci/ropensci instead. (Could alternatively be just a new repo in rocker-org, I've no opinion either way). yay/nay?

I think our other 5 images fit much better into the core rocker scope as things other people would build upon.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

I'll let you make that call. It's kinda useful to have it in rocker-org as a use case.

But if you'd rather have it within rOpenSci, I can see the merit of that as well.

(Maybe hadleyverse want to be a repo in rocker-org as well? I can see a clear case for r-base, r-devel, rstudio being the core. The rest is really sugar coating.)

@cboettig
Copy link
Member Author

yup, i like the idea of moving hadleyverse and r-devel-san to their own
repos in rocker-org, and ropensci as well. That reflects our original
discussion of 'base' vs use-case repos. I will go ahead and break out all
three if there are no objections?

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

I'll let you make that call. It's kinda useful to have it in rocker-org as
a use case.

But if you'd rather have it within rOpenSci, I can see the merit of that
as well.

(Maybe hadleyverse want to be a repo in rocker-org as well? I can see a
clear case for r-base, r-devel, rstudio being the core. The rest is really
sugar coating.)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#30 (comment).

Carl Boettiger
UC Santa Cruz
http://carlboettiger.info/

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

No that sounds very, very good. Also gets us closer to less costly commit to the main rocker repo...

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

Oh if you think "I should move out" with r-devel-san I can surely do so (on the weekend)...

@cboettig
Copy link
Member Author

I think this is all done! I also added the automated build link to r-devel-san to update whenever r-base is updated.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

Thanks for updating r-devel-san that way!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants