Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 1, 2024. It is now read-only.

Two different names for the Rocky Foundation in February News? #34

Closed
AtjonTV opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #38
Closed

Two different names for the Rocky Foundation in February News? #34

AtjonTV opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #38
Assignees
@jorp
Labels
priority: low This issue or pull request is of low priority tag: content Additions to (or modifications of) content in the repository type: maintenance To improve or continue maintenance for something

Comments

@AtjonTV
Copy link

AtjonTV commented Mar 16, 2021

Describe the bug

On the February News article in the first paragraph near the end it says the name changed to Rocky Software Enterprise Foundation yet under Legal it says Rocky Enterprise Software Foundation.

It's a fairly minor issue but will cause confusion when reading and not knowing which is correct.
@hbjydev hbjydev added priority: low This issue or pull request is of low priority tag: content Additions to (or modifications of) content in the repository type: maintenance To improve or continue maintenance for something labels Mar 17, 2021
@jorp
Copy link
Contributor

jorp commented Mar 18, 2021

fixed per rocky-linux/rockylinux.org#38. great eye @AtjonTV, thank you!

@jorp jorp linked a pull request Mar 18, 2021 that will close this issue
fix: corrected signature per issue #34 #38
Merged
@AtjonTV
Copy link
Author

AtjonTV commented Mar 18, 2021

Thanks, but what about the things I actually mentioned? That in Summery and Legal there are two different ways the new name is written ..

The Linux Foundation to license Rocky Linux under the Rocky Software Enterprise Foundation,

Note the "Rocky Software Enterprise"

We have renamed the “Rocky Linux Foundation” (RESF) to the “Rocky Enterprise Software Foundation”

Note the "Rocky Enterprise Software"

@jorp
Copy link
Contributor

jorp commented Mar 18, 2021 •
edited

@AtjonTV Forgive me for not reading that thoroughly.. I have now addressed this here. I'm glad that enabled me to find another inconsistency, so thank you x2.

hbjydev added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2021
@hbjydev
chore(merge): #34 -> develop
bc6e081 
fix: corrected signature per issue #34
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@jorp jorp

Labels
priority: low This issue or pull request is of low priority tag: content Additions to (or modifications of) content in the repository type: maintenance To improve or continue maintenance for something
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

fix: corrected signature per issue #34
4 participants
@jorp @hbjydev @AtjonTV @FoggyMtnDrifter