-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Strange accuracy problem whereas RTK received #17
Comments
in my opinion ,the outcome of the integration of INS/GNSS is worse than RTK at the begining! so you may check your INS algrithm and Kalman Fusion Equation! |
Dear brumann,
I think you should tune the values of Q and R matrices. Errors in KF tend
to be very sensitive to the values of these matrices.
Regards.
--
Rodrigo Gonzalez
El mié., 19 sept. 2018 a las 3:37, brumann (<notifications@github.com>)
escribió:
… Dear Rodrigo,
First of all thank you for your code, it is very helpful.
However I noticed a strange phenomenon, at the beginning of my simulation
the hybridization is actually worse than GPS alone. For almost 3min there
is about 35cm of error for the hybride trajectory whereas GPS error is
below 2cm. Imu data are generated from the reference trajectory, with error
estimated in static with Allan-variance.
What I do not understand is that since GPS.stdm is of about 1cm for this
period, the kalman filter should give more weight to GNSS, and it appears
not to be the case ? I have spent days on it, I don't see what I am missing.
I tried to take only gnss when RTK is received, with no success (kalman
filter diverge).
Screenshots are attached.
Thank you in advance for your answer
Sincerely,
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42934775/45734829-29070c00-bbe6-11e8-9fa0-f5f4735e7622.png>
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42934775/45734818-22789480-bbe6-11e8-91f6-4febc5317252.png>
(The vehicle starts moving after 15sec)
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#17>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFLi_MOMhcQG0VQKTh_m0zzLlFPLJL72ks5uceYwgaJpZM4WvgO8>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Dear Rodrigo,
First of all thank you for your code, it is very helpful.
However I noticed a strange phenomenon, at the beginning of my simulation the hybridization is actually worse than GPS alone. For almost 3min there is about 35cm of error for the hybride trajectory whereas GPS error is below 2cm. Imu data are generated from the reference trajectory, with error estimated in static with Allan-variance.
What I do not understand is that since GPS.stdm is of about 1cm for this period, the kalman filter should give more weight to GNSS, and it appears not to be the case ? I have spent days on it, I don't see what I am missing.
I tried to take only gnss when RTK is received, with no success (kalman filter diverge).
Screenshots are attached.
Thank you in advance for your answer
Sincerely,
(The vehicle starts moving after 15sec)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: