Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License questions #17

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 26, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

License questions #17

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 26, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

1. License contains a reference to grnxx: "grnxx - An open-source fulltext 
search engine and column store."  Is this intentional?

2. BSD part contain "<ORGANIZATION>" placeholder which should be probably 
replaced with some organization name. 

3. Is it OK that I'm referring to you personally and to marisa-trie C++ library 
in a wrapper README (https://github.com/kmike/marisa-trie)? License says that 
"Neither the name of the <ORGANIZATION> nor the names of its contributors may 
be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without 
specific prior written permission."

Original issue reported on code.google.com by kmik...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2013 at 6:47

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

link to README becomes broken above; proper link: 
https://github.com/kmike/marisa-trie/blob/master/README.rst

Original comment by kmik...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2013 at 6:49

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

1. Sorry, it's due to a mistake. I'll fix it soon.

2. There are no organization to replace the placeholder because I was 
unemployed when I developed marisa-trie. So, I left it as it is.

3. No problem. Thank you. Do you think the BSD 2-clause license is better than 
the 3-clause one? The 2-clause license does not contain the sentence "Neither 
the name of ..."

Original comment by susumu.y...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2013 at 11:41

  • Changed state: Accepted

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

2. "In all BSD licences as <organization> is the organization of the <copyright 
holder> or just the <copyright holder>" - so it should be fine to just use a 
name instead of organization;

3. I like 2-clause BSD (or a very similar MIT license) more because of its 
simplicity - it is not always clear what "endorse or promote" means in 3-clause 
BSD license; but of course you can use any license for this wonderful piece of 
software. Thanks for the clarification.

Original comment by kmik...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2013 at 11:58

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

marisa-trie is now dual-licensed under the BSD *2-clause* license and the LGPL 
(2.1 or any later version).

Thanks!

Original comment by susumu.y...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2013 at 12:34

  • Changed state: Fixed

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Thanks!

Original comment by kmik...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2013 at 3:03

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant