Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "chore: enhance full client status tests" #1521

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

Manav-Aggarwal
Copy link
Member

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal commented Feb 1, 2024

Reverts #1504

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved and streamlined testing for node status information, enhancing reliability and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The update simplifies testing within the TestStatus function by streamlining assertions and removing unnecessary checks. It focuses on enhancing clarity and efficiency by directly asserting key components like SyncInfo, ValidatorInfo, and NodeInfo, while also refining the approach to testing block heights and hardcoding certain values for consistency.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../full_client_test.go Simplified TestStatus function: streamlined assertions, updated SyncInfo block heights, removed redundant checks, hardcoded VotingPower.

Poem

🐰✨
In the land of code, where tests abound,
A rabbit hopped, improvements found.
"Less is more," it said with glee,
As it pruned the tests, so wild and free.
🌟📝

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a4b3cd9 and 41859d2.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • node/full_client_test.go (1 hunks)

node/full_client_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
node/full_client_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
node/full_client_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 1, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit d91adbc Feb 1, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal deleted the revert-1504-1259 branch February 1, 2024 22:33
@Manav-Aggarwal
Copy link
Member Author

Reverted since it introduced a flaky test

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2024
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants