We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We can see from clisops.ops.subset::subset that most of the workflow will be independent of the actual operation:
clisops.ops.subset::subset
clisops/clisops/ops/subset.py
Line 53 in ffeb599
The differences are:
clisops.core.*
Would it make sense to create a class that worked through the stages?
The latter, get_outputs could, in turn, be a class that brings together:
get_outputs
The clisops.ops.subset could then be a class or function with dectorators:
clisops.ops.subset
@validate_ds def subset(ds, .....): mapped_args = utils.map_params(...) ds = clisops.core.subset(ds, ...) output_handler = OutputHandler(ds, ...) return output_handler.get_outputs()
NOTE: we also need to simplify, or find a way to remove: clisops.ops.subset::_subset
clisops.ops.subset::_subset
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Implemented with op_average branch.
op_average
Sorry, something went wrong.
agstephens
No branches or pull requests
We can see from
clisops.ops.subset::subset
that most of the workflow will be independent of the actual operation:clisops/clisops/ops/subset.py
Line 53 in ffeb599
The differences are:
clisops.core.*
Would it make sense to create a class that worked through the stages?
The latter,
get_outputs
could, in turn, be a class that brings together:The
clisops.ops.subset
could then be a class or function with dectorators:NOTE: we also need to simplify, or find a way to remove:
clisops.ops.subset::_subset
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: