Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

other lightning implementations #46

Closed
renepickhardt opened this issue Aug 15, 2018 · 12 comments
Closed

other lightning implementations #46

renepickhardt opened this issue Aug 15, 2018 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@renepickhardt
Copy link

As far as I see the raspiblitz currently only runs with lnd. is there any reason (other then manpower) to not include c-lightning and have the user prompted which implementation they want to run? If there is no reason I might take the lead to also include c-lightning.

@rootzoll
Copy link
Collaborator

rootzoll commented Aug 16, 2018

Having both to choose/switch between LND and c-lightning would be great ... related to manpower we just ran with LND in the beginning.

@renepickhardt would be great if you can take the lead on c-lightning integration. We maybe have to see if it makes sense to restructure the shell-scripts a bit for that, so that we dont get too much into a if/then hell. Maybe first step could be to put all LND related shell script fragments into a kind of Lightning-Service Shell-Library: https://bash.cyberciti.biz/guide/Shell_functions_library .. and then in a second step to make this Library dynamically work with LND or c-Lightning where possible. Do you think that makes sense?

@renepickhardt
Copy link
Author

I think it does. I realized most of the stuff is shell script which is not necessarily my favorite language. so if you are strong on shell script I would rather have you to restructure the scripts and basically create an abstraction layer for interaction with the lightning node. once that is done I could easily do all the c-lightning related stuff. or we just do it together before , while or after the lightning hackday in berlin (:

@rootzoll
Copy link
Collaborator

I think thats a good task for the hackday :) ... lets go thru the scripts together and see it the steps that are in there for LND make also sense for c-lightning or if it may need even more rearrangement, than just an abstraction layer.

@renepickhardt
Copy link
Author

bsss I am thinking all the time that it might by cool to buy a raspiblitz. now I get even more tempted...

@rootzoll
Copy link
Collaborator

Some guide to look into: https://medium.com/@meeDamian/c-lightning-node-on-rbp3-b950660fb835

@rootzoll
Copy link
Collaborator

@nyxnor
Copy link
Contributor

nyxnor commented Apr 30, 2021

@renepickhardt

If there is no reason I might take the lead to also include c-lightning.

Hi Mr Pickhardt.

@nyxnor
Copy link
Contributor

nyxnor commented May 11, 2021

@rootzoll Please close this, Openoms continued here #2295 (comment)

@openoms
Copy link
Collaborator

openoms commented May 11, 2021

Some guide to look into: https://medium.com/@meeDamian/c-lightning-node-on-rbp3-b950660fb835

This guide is actually still useful.

We can leave this open until there are other lightning implementations to implement :).

@openoms
Copy link
Collaborator

openoms commented Nov 8, 2021

C-lightning is implemented. Closing this issue for inactivity.

@nyxnor
Copy link
Contributor

nyxnor commented Nov 8, 2021

I remember fiatjaf posting about wen eclair on the last blitz release, but if noone will do it, then ok.

@openoms
Copy link
Collaborator

openoms commented Nov 8, 2021

Sure and there is the Rust LDK too.
If someone starts to work on these will worth it's own issue. Even it's own project tbh (fork of this one or not).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants