tests tests tests!

[mpadge]

Write them, and consider this issue.

[mpadge]

First mocked tests here, but there must be a better way to define the return value from with_mock other than having to paste wholesale code from the originating function?

[mpadge]

@n-s-f Just a expression of gratitude for your excellently programmed mockery package which I've also praised in this ROpenSci discussion. I've also incorporated your stub.R code within this package and acknowledged your contribution - thanks!

@Robinlovelace - you might be interested to see how much cleaner these tests are using stub rather than with_mock. This will be the basic structure of all tests from hereon. Any further suggestions appreciated ...

[nsfinkelstein]

@mpadge Thanks so much for the kind words! I'm glad you're finding the code useful.

[mpadge]

@n-s-f just found about from @sckott about his webmockr package. Just in case either of you weren't aware of the other ...

[nsfinkelstein]

@mpadge Thanks for the heads up! Hadn't seen it. @sckott, this looks very cool.

[sckott]

hi all, webmockr targets mocking http requests, so no overlap i don't think