-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
blacklist a few packages on kinetic #38
Conversation
For the ueye package, only the arm64 build is failing because it can't detect the architecture and the manufacture doesn't provide binaries for arm64. The armhf build should be fine. I guess blacklisting works. |
It's a bit confusing, the configuration file for both armhf and arm64 files is called "release-armhf-build.yaml". So this PR will blacklist the package for both armhf and arm64. @tfoote should it be renamed release-arm-build.yaml? |
+1 It's renamed in the production branch, this should be cherry picked there too. |
hmm, how would you cherry-pick the commit into production if the file has a different name? The only way I know how to that quickly would be to copy the changes into the file--you can do it if you have a better way |
It was a rename so git might be able to track it. We should probably rename this branch to to keep it parallel. |
Looks like the Qt4-version of libqglviewer is missing for armhf: http://repositories.ros.org/ubuntu/building/pool/main/libq/libqglviewer/ Don't think it's a problem to blacklist octovis for armh, since it's just a visualization tool. |
That's fine with me. |
Signed-off-by: Scott K Logan <logans@cottsay.net>
I am blacklisting packages that are failing to build for ARM on the Kinetic build farm that were also disabled for Jade or Indigo.
Maintainers, please contact us in the future if you have a solution for the failing arm builds and would like to reenable them on the farm. Thanks.
@mani-monaj (ardrone_autonomy)
@ahornung (octovis)
@kmhallen (ueye)