Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get joint model names from joint_model_group_ #1569

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2019

Conversation

Dale-Koenig
Copy link
Contributor

@Dale-Koenig Dale-Koenig commented Jul 17, 2019

Remove dependence on move_group action server by getting the joint model names through joint_model_group_ instead.

Description

closes #1563

Uses joint_model_group_ instead of MoveGroupInterface to get joint names

Checklist

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 17, 2019

Thanks for helping in improving MoveIt!

@rhaschke rhaschke requested a review from AndyZe July 17, 2019 06:46
Copy link
Contributor

@rhaschke rhaschke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this contribution. Obviously, you didn't test this change.
The joint_model_group_ variable was never initialized and thus cannot be used. I think you should use the RobotModelLoader to create a RobotModel and from there you can access JointModelGroups.

moveit_experimental/jog_arm/src/jog_arm/jog_calcs.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Dale-Koenig Dale-Koenig force-pushed the joint_model_names branch 2 times, most recently from d45e1c0 to 4f012c1 Compare July 19, 2019 01:01
Remove dependence on move_group action server by getting the joint model names through joint_model_group_ instead.
Copy link
Contributor

@v4hn v4hn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me,
although I don't see a reason to have a clang-tidy fixup included in the same commit...

@Dale-Koenig
Copy link
Contributor Author

looks good to me,
although I don't see a reason to have a clang-tidy fixup included in the same commit...

Best to split into two commits? Or just let clang-tidy fail?

@v4hn
Copy link
Contributor

v4hn commented Jul 31, 2019 via email

@rhaschke rhaschke merged commit 3cb561d into moveit:master Jul 31, 2019
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 31, 2019

Congrats on getting your first MoveIt! pull request merged and improving open source robotics!

@Dale-Koenig Dale-Koenig deleted the joint_model_names branch October 11, 2019 01:14
@tylerjw tylerjw mentioned this pull request May 8, 2020
20 tasks
tylerjw pushed a commit to PickNikRobotics/moveit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2020
tylerjw pushed a commit to PickNikRobotics/moveit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

jog_arm_server relies on move_group action server (moveit_experimental)
3 participants