-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 511
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replaced single value joint_limit_margin with list of joint_limit_margin #2576
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2576 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 50.85% 50.86% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 388 388
Lines 32360 32363 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 16453 16458 +5
+ Misses 15907 15905 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
1db1c0a
to
52aebd3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No big deal, but just a hint for the future: rename the branch before you open a PR. I would've called it joint_limit_list
or something like that. This will help if you have lots of PR's open at once.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good -- just some formatting suggestions
… Enabling setting individual margins for each joint.
…o.cpp to give a clear error message if the size of joint_limit_margis does not match the number of joints of the move_group
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Castro <4603398+sea-bass@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
Related Issue: #2570
Enabling individual joint_limit_margins for each joint. This is useful, for example, when different types of joints are used. One value for all margins (as before) is not necessarily suitable for all joints. E.g. when revolute and prismatic joints exist.
Checklist