Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support specifying pipeline ids with planning requests #95

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2021
Merged

Support specifying pipeline ids with planning requests #95

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2021

Conversation

henningkayser
Copy link
Member

Required for moveit/moveit#2127

@henningkayser henningkayser mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2020
Merged
8 tasks
v4hn
v4hn approved these changes Mar 15, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@v4hn v4hn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address my inline comments.

As this is not merged yet, I think everyone agrees we should merge message changes together with their respective implementation to avoid previously reported issues. 👍

msg/MotionPlanRequest.msg Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
msg/MotionPlanRequest.msg Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
msg/PlannerInterfaceDescription.msg Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@henningkayser henningkayser merged commit f42f124 into moveit:master Mar 17, 2021
@rhaschke rhaschke mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2021
Open
JafarAbdi pushed a commit to JafarAbdi/moveit_msgs that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2021
@henningkayser @JafarAbdi
Support specifying pipeline ids with planning requests (moveit#95)
6cddc4f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@v4hn v4hn v4hn approved these changes

@rhaschke rhaschke rhaschke approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@henningkayser @v4hn @rhaschke