[gazebo_plugins] fix Issue #243: Use x-forward z-up frame for pointcloud #1027
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I had the same problem also on melodic, this commit fixed it. |
|
Could you please share the .so file "libgazebo_ros_openni_kinect.so" so we can use this fix until the commit is merged? |
|
Why it's not merged yet? It's been already 6 years since issue first appeared... Unless there are some not so obvious reasons why should point cloud be oriented like z-forward, but I can not think such use-case. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've observed issue #243 on a melodic-based robot simulation I ran yesterday. Using the ROS body frame convention (x-forward, z-up), solved the issue for me (cf attached screenshot)
