Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DELAYED_THROTTLE versions of log macros #581

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 20, 2015

Conversation

galou
Copy link

@galou galou commented Mar 17, 2015

Add for example the ROS_DEBUG_DELAYED_THROTTLE to print a throttled message where the first message will not appear before a time delay of rate has elapsed.

Cf. discussion #571.

@ros-pull-request-builder
Copy link
Member

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member

wjwwood commented Mar 17, 2015

Looks reasonable to me.

@tfoote
Copy link
Member

tfoote commented Mar 17, 2015

It looks good, but we should target it for jade. This is a large low level API change.

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

@ros-pull-request-builder
Copy link
Member

Test passed.
Refer to this link for build results: http://jenkins.ros.org/job/_pull_request-indigo-ros_comm/163/

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

@tfoote Since the PR does not change any existing API but only introduces a new group of macros I would merge this to Indigo. Worst case which can happen is it doesn't build (since the tests passed that not the case) or the new feature does not work as expected.

dirk-thomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2015
Add DELAYED_THROTTLE versions of log macros
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas merged commit 7dc9369 into ros:indigo-devel Mar 20, 2015
@galou galou deleted the delayed_throttle branch March 23, 2015 07:37
rsinnet pushed a commit to MisoRobotics/ros_comm that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2017
Add DELAYED_THROTTLE versions of log macros
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants