New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removed TODO #243
Removed TODO #243
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <ahcorde@gmail.com>
This seems like a weird action, I think a service is the most appropriate interface - but I suppose it doesn't hurt. Has anyone been requesting this? |
Nope, I just saw the TODO |
My feedback is "lets just remove the TODO and see if anyone cares" since it doesn't seem that anyone has until now. But, hey, on the other hand, its not hurting anyone to add the new action. |
I'd be more for removing the TODO. We shouldn't add things in that don't have users, in my opinion. |
Thanks for finding the TODO and reviewing it. But I think that the GetMap action doesn't add a lot of value on top of the GetMap Service so as there's no demand we might as well not add it and keep things simpler. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without feedback this doesn't add anything on top of the service. And we now have async service clients so that's not a benefit anymore either.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernández Cordero <ahcorde@gmail.com>
Thank you for the feedback, I just removed the TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for cleaning this up!
There is a TODO that mentioned the adition of this message. Happy to remove the comment and the new message if this is not required anymore
There is already a service called GetMap.srv
@SteveMacenski, @tfoote ?