Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pass node to client and service destroy funcs and enable tests for connext #67

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 29, 2016

Conversation

wjwwood
Copy link
Member

@wjwwood wjwwood commented Jul 6, 2016

Connects to ros2/rmw_connext#168.

@wjwwood wjwwood added the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Jul 6, 2016
if(rmw_implementation STREQUAL "rmw_opensplice_cpp")
if(
rmw_implementation STREQUAL "rmw_opensplice_cpp"
OR rmw_implementation STREQUAL "rmw_connext_cpp"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The OR should be trailing the previous line.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, maybe this whole check should be removed now. I started these changes before FastRTPS got some upgrades. I'm testing that out right now.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a different problem with FastRTPS, but I think I'll invert the logic now that FastRTPS is the only one with an issue and I'll open an issue to track the problems with FastRTPS.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed the logic (596c0ec) and opened issues to track why:

@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
# define CLASSNAME(NAME, SUFFIX) NAME
#endif

bool is_connext =
std::string(rmw_get_implementation_identifier()).find("connext") != std::string::npos;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this find specific enough or should it better check for find("rmw_connext") == 0?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is good enough, but I'll change it anyways: 0d9ecc1

@wjwwood wjwwood merged commit 74574a4 into master Oct 29, 2016
@wjwwood wjwwood deleted the local_graph_changes branch October 29, 2016 01:30
@wjwwood wjwwood removed the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Oct 29, 2016
emersonknapp pushed a commit to aws-ros-dev/rcl that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019
* check allocator validity before using it

* use allocator_is_valid and remove remnant from c_utilities

* print to stderr only if RCUTILS_REPORT_ERROR_HANDLING_ERRORS defined

* use public RCUTILS_SAFE_FWRITE_TO_STDERR
ivanpauno pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2020
* Check if ament index resource exists before accessing
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants