Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated benchmark package to use writer close() instead of old reset() #881

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2021

Conversation

adamdbrw
Copy link
Collaborator

@adamdbrw adamdbrw commented Oct 13, 2021

A minor fix which restores benchmarking package build.

rosbag2_performance_benchmarking stopped building since #760. The reason for this going under the radar might be that CI checks no longer build this package with required flag BUILD_ROSBAG2_BENCHMARKS. We need to address that by either removing the flag and making package build by default, or making sure the flag stays in auto checks.

Signed-off-by: Adam Dabrowski <adam.dabrowski@robotec.ai>
@adamdbrw adamdbrw requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2021 09:35
@adamdbrw adamdbrw requested review from lihui815, zmichaels11 and emersonknapp and removed request for a team October 13, 2021 09:35
@adamdbrw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I see some test failures that are clearly unrelated

@adamdbrw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This also needs a Galactic backport since the issue is there as well

@emersonknapp emersonknapp merged commit 7cd143e into master Oct 13, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the benchmarking_package_build_fix branch October 13, 2021 18:08
emersonknapp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2021
)

* Updated benchmark package to use writer close() instead of old reset()

Signed-off-by: Adam Dabrowski <adam.dabrowski@robotec.ai>

* Updated node declare_parameter to new syntax
- also added required defaults for optional parameters (qos set)

Signed-off-by: Adam Dabrowski <adam.dabrowski@robotec.ai>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants