-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Advantages over pure RQ #85
Comments
Actually I couldn't get anything working with |
yes, on python 3.7 I keeps getting errors with this, will go back to pure rq |
Judging by the lack of communication by the authors, I consider this package to be dead. |
Hey @moi90, I would suggest to double-check your expectations when you open a ticket with a statement referring to your inability to weigh the pros and cons of a free (read: created in my unpaid, free time) software package. I'm honestly just sad to see how you got from your original issue statement
to
And frankly until shown otherwise, I can only assume a bad faith attempt at guilt-tripping someone to provide additional free labor to make it easier for your to understand how the software works. I would have loved if you would have written:
But you didn't, so it's mostly your loss. |
No, not at all! I'm sorry if it came across this way. Rather, I was hoping for some directions that would have enabled me to understand the differences. If I had understood the differences myself, I would have made some more specific suggestions of even opened a pull request to enhance the documentation. My judgement is solely based on the fact that there was no reaction whatsoever for more than one year. |
I think the documentation would benefit from an explanation why we need Flask-RQ2 if we could use pure RQ as well. I have a hard time spotting the differences.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: