We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See https://github.com/ruby/pp/actions/runs/7489634039/job/20386628987
=============================================================================== Failure: test_lasgn_literal(PPTestModule::PPAbstractSyntaxTree) /home/runner/work/pp/pp/test/test_pp.rb:235:in `test_lasgn_literal' 232: def test_lasgn_literal 233: ast = AST.parse("_=1") 234: expected = "(SCOPE@1:0-1:3 tbl: [:_] args: nil body: (LASGN@1:0-1:3 :_ (LIT@1:2-1:3 1)))" => 235: assert_equal(expected, PP.singleline_pp(ast, ''.dup), ast) 236: end 237: end 238: end #<RubyVM::AbstractSyntaxTree::Node:0x00007f8b9029b4e0> <"(SCOPE@1:0-1:3 tbl: [:_] args: nil body: (LASGN@1:0-1:3 :_ (LIT@1:2-1:3 1)))"> expected but was <"(SCOPE@1:0-1:3 tbl: [:_] args: nil body: (LASGN@1:0-1:3 :_ (INTEGER@1:2-1:3 1)))"> diff: ? (SCOPE@1:0-1:3 tbl: [:_] args: nil body: (LASGN@1:0-1:3 :_ (LINTEGER@1:2-1:3 1))) ===============================================================================
Probably not ideal to depend on unstable/experimental RubyVM::AbstractSyntaxTree in pp's CI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current HEAD is working fine.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
See https://github.com/ruby/pp/actions/runs/7489634039/job/20386628987
Probably not ideal to depend on unstable/experimental RubyVM::AbstractSyntaxTree in pp's CI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: