You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for sharing your codes and annotations.
I found that social activity annotation labels are quite different from reported labels in the paper.
There are 11 social activity classes in the Fig 3 of the paper.
But in 'group.pbtxt' files, first 27 classes which are same as individual action classes,
and only 5 new social activity classes which are 'chatting', 'working together', "join/leave/expansion/narrow", "human object interaction", and "complicated".
Most of the classes reported in the paper are missing.
Considering single-person group, the number of social activity classes should be 27 (inidvidual action) + 11 (social activity) = 36.
But there are only 32.
Do I miss something???
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for sharing your codes and annotations.
I found that social activity annotation labels are quite different from reported labels in the paper.
There are 11 social activity classes in the Fig 3 of the paper.
But in 'group.pbtxt' files, first 27 classes which are same as individual action classes,
and only 5 new social activity classes which are 'chatting', 'working together', "join/leave/expansion/narrow", "human object interaction", and "complicated".
Most of the classes reported in the paper are missing.
Considering single-person group, the number of social activity classes should be 27 (inidvidual action) + 11 (social activity) = 36.
But there are only 32.
Do I miss something???
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: