Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Pin cargo-public-api version #2893

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

tcharding
Copy link
Member

So that updates don't break our CI setup used a specific version of cargo-public-api, this means we will have to update it manually periodically though.

For now, since the latest release just broke us, use the release from a month ago.

So that updates don't break our CI setup used a specific version of
`cargo-public-api`, this means we will have to update it manually
periodically though.

For now, since the latest release just broke us, use the release from a
month ago.
Copy link
Collaborator

@Kixunil Kixunil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 7e3b2eb

@@ -317,6 +317,6 @@ jobs:
with:
toolchain: ${{ needs.Prepare.outputs.nightly_version }}
- name: "Install cargo-public-api"
run: cargo install --locked cargo-public-api
run: cargo install cargo-public-api@0.35.0 --locked
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why change the order? I'm surprised it even works. Usually switches go before positional arguments.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would guess that as long as everything is after install it'll work in any order.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh woops I just cut and pasted it from the docs at some stage while I was playing with it, I should not have included that change.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in #2900

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 7e3b2eb

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit 9ba29b3 into rust-bitcoin:master Jun 21, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants