Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo in literal_representation.rs #4809

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 15, 2020
Merged

Conversation

iankronquist
Copy link
Contributor

@iankronquist iankronquist commented Nov 13, 2019

Octal numbers can't have 8 in them ;)

changelog: none

Octal numbers can't have 8 in them ;)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **Known problems:**
/// - Recommends a signed suffix, even though the number might be too big and an unsigned
/// suffix is required
/// - Does not match on `_128` since that is a valid grouping for decimal and octal numbers
/// - Does not match on `_128` since that is a valid grouping for decimal and hexadecimal numbers
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/// - Does not match on `_128` since that is a valid grouping for decimal and hexadecimal numbers
/// - Does not match on `_127` since that is a valid grouping for decimal and octal numbers

It's not a valid grouping for hex number though 😉

@JohnTitor JohnTitor added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) label Nov 14, 2019
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

ping from triage @iankronquist. Can you apply the suggestion, so we can merge this PR?

@iankronquist
Copy link
Contributor Author

@flip1995 sorry about the delay. Hope that fixes it.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

I'd rather change the example to a valid octal number and keep the "decimal and octal" part.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

📌 Commit aef2662 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

⌛ Testing commit aef2662 with merge 779b6ae...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2020
Typo in literal_representation.rs

Octal numbers can't have 8 in them ;)

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 15, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 779b6ae to master...

@bors bors merged commit aef2662 into rust-lang:master Feb 15, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2020
…logiq,flip1995

I like to move it, move it

GHA now runs in the background for 6 days (#5088)

Since then ~~15~~ 19 PRs were successfully merged and Travis+Appveyor agreed on the status in every case. ([GitHub PR search query](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Amerged+merged%3A%3E%3D2020-02-12T15%3A42%3A00+sort%3Aupdated-desc+NOT+%5Bgh-pages%5D+in%3Atitle))

Some PRs were:
- #5163
- #5170
- #5168
- #5173
- #5171
- #5156
- #4809
- #5177
- #5182
- #5183
- #5184
- #5185
- #5186
- #5181
- #5189

Bug with GHA:
- When a rustc PR gets merged between the `integration_build` and the `integration` job, the `integration` job will fail. This happened once in #5162, but not in the past 6 days. Even if it would happen every 4th PR we would save time, since splitting up the integration build and tests saves 5-7 minutes per run and a complete run takes 15-17 minutes
- Sometimes the MacOS build takes up to an hour to download the master toolchain. Until now, this happend 2 or 3 times and can be resolved by a `@bors r3try`+canceling the previous run (restarting single jobs is not supported yet)

## Before merging this, rust-lang/rust-central-station#578 has to get merged

This PR is for starting the discussion and to get consensus (@rust-lang/clippy) on a final move to GHA. If we're ready, I'll contact Pietro, to finalize the move.

changelog: Clippy completely runs on GHA now 🎉

---

BTW: The deployment already runs on GHA, instead of Travis.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants