Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extend bindings_after_at (b1 @ Some(b2)) tests with nested or_patterns #67311

Closed
Centril opened this issue Dec 15, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #69817
Closed

Extend bindings_after_at (b1 @ Some(b2)) tests with nested or_patterns #67311

Centril opened this issue Dec 15, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #69817
Assignees
@rustbot
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue. E-medium Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate. F-bindings_after_at `#![feature(bindings_after_at)]` F-or_patterns `#![feature(or_patterns)]` F-slice_patterns `#![feature(slice_patterns)]` T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Dec 15, 2019 •
edited by rustbot
Loading

Once #![feature(or_patterns)] (#54883), i.e. pat_0 | ... | pat_n in nested positions, e.g. Some(Ok(a) | Err(b)) have progressed sufficiently in their implementation, e.g. when the MIR building implementation is done, we should extend the test suite for #![feature(bindings_after_at)] (#65490), e.g. b1 @ Some(b2), to exercise the combination of these two features. Ideally, we would also account for the combination of those two with #![feature(slice_patterns)] (#62254) and #![feature(box_patterns)] (#29641) as well to make things really air-tight.

This issue has been assigned to @thekuom via this comment.
@Centril Centril added E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue. A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. E-medium Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate. S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. F-or_patterns `#![feature(or_patterns)]` F-bindings_after_at `#![feature(bindings_after_at)]` F-slice_patterns `#![feature(slice_patterns)]` labels Dec 15, 2019
@Centril Centril mentioned this issue Dec 21, 2019
Closed
8 tasks
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Dec 24, 2019

This is almost unblocked now that #66296 has landed. However, we need more progress on or-patterns.

@JohnTitor JohnTitor added the C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. label Jan 19, 2020
@Centril Centril removed the S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label Feb 14, 2020
@thekuom
Copy link
Contributor

thekuom commented Mar 4, 2020

Can I work on this one?

@Centril

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Mar 4, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Sure, go right ahead.

@rustbot assign @thekuom

@rustbot rustbot assigned rustbot and unassigned rustbot Mar 4, 2020
thekuom added a commit to thekuom/rust that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2020
@thekuom
test(pattern): add tests for combinations of pattern features
5456114 
Reference issue rust-lang#67311

Tests combinations of the following pattern features:
- bindings_after_at
- or_patterns
- slice_patterns
- box_patterns
@thekuom thekuom mentioned this issue Mar 4, 2020
Merged
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2020
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#69690 - thekuom:test/67311-extend-bindings-…
4f87d9f 
…after-at-tests, r=Centril

test(pattern): add tests for combinations of pattern features

Reference issue rust-lang#67311

Tests combinations of the following pattern features:
- bindings_after_at
- or_patterns
- slice_patterns
- box_patterns

r? @Centril
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2020
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#69690 - thekuom:test/67311-extend-bindings-…
ba1f6cb 
…after-at-tests, r=Centril

test(pattern): add tests for combinations of pattern features

Reference issue rust-lang#67311

Tests combinations of the following pattern features:
- bindings_after_at
- or_patterns
- slice_patterns
- box_patterns

r? @Centril
@thekuom thekuom mentioned this issue Mar 9, 2020
Merged
@bors bors closed this as completed in 08095f4 Mar 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rustbot rustbot

Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. E-easy Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue. E-medium Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate. F-bindings_after_at `#![feature(bindings_after_at)]` F-or_patterns `#![feature(or_patterns)]` F-slice_patterns `#![feature(slice_patterns)]` T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

test(patterns): add patterns feature tests to borrowck test suite thekuom/rust
4 participants
@Centril @thekuom @JohnTitor @rustbot