Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BITWIDTH #101435

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

JakobDegen
Copy link
Contributor

This commit removes the annotation only for those tests where the 32 bit and 64 bit files were exactly identical. I didn't touch anything in the mir-opt/const directory, since having this annotation there seems more principled, even if it doesn't make a difference.

This also removes four additional files related to the separate_const_switch.rs test. The associated annotations were removed in #100827 , but I forgot to remove the files as well. (#97564 is the issue tracking an automated check here)

r? @wesleywiser

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 5, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 7, 2022

📌 Commit 46130a1 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 7, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
…ywiser

Remove unnecessary `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BITWIDTH`

This commit removes the annotation only for those tests where the 32 bit and 64 bit files were exactly identical. I didn't touch anything in the `mir-opt/const` directory, since having this annotation there seems more principled, even if it doesn't make a difference.

This also removes four additional files related to the `separate_const_switch.rs` test. The associated annotations were removed in rust-lang#100827 , but I forgot to remove the files as well. (rust-lang#97564 is the issue tracking an automated check here)

r? ``@wesleywiser``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101343 (Add -api-level to pm command)
 - rust-lang#101416 (stdio: Document no support for writing to non-blocking stdio/stderr)
 - rust-lang#101435 (Remove unnecessary `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BITWIDTH`)
 - rust-lang#101493 (Pass ImplTraitContext as &mut to avoid the need of ImplTraitContext::reborrow)
 - rust-lang#101502 (Do not suggest a semicolon for a macro without `!`)
 - rust-lang#101503 (Add debug calls)
 - rust-lang#101506 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > .since`)
 - rust-lang#101507 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > table td`)
 - rust-lang#101521 (Rustdoc-Json: More accurate struct type.)
 - rust-lang#101525 (Fix typo in pass_manager.rs)
 - rust-lang#101534 (rustdoc: remove unused mobile CSS `.rustdoc { flex-direction }`)
 - rust-lang#101535 (Fix error printing mistake in tidy)
 - rust-lang#101536 (Add documentation for Attr::is_doc_comment)
 - rust-lang#101538 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.content .methods > div`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1d65e96 into rust-lang:master Sep 7, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 7, 2022
@JakobDegen JakobDegen deleted the bitwidth-tests branch September 25, 2022 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants