Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #105979

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #105979

merged 21 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

i686-apple-darwin should use `-arch i386` instead of `-arch i686`
Since f50bf86 changed anchors to be
always positioned absolute, specifying it on hover as well is redundant.
…linux-gnu`

It's not used anywhere in CI, and it seems of questionable use.
It was first added in 0e272de, which looks like it's just intended for CI, not as a user-facing feature.
…illaumeGomez

docs: add long error explanation for error E0472

Add long-form error docs for E0472: "inline assembly not supported on this target" and update UI tests.

R? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Fix an opaque type ICE

fixes rust-lang#104551

The issue is that if you have

```rust
type T = impl Sized;
let (_a, _b): T = ..
```

we have only the type annotation `T`, but want to use that ascription for `_a` and `_b`, so what we generate is a type ascription plus a field projection saying `_a`'s type is `T::0`. Of course `T` has no fields. Of course we could also not generate type annotations for projections into opaque types at all, but that's more fragile, as we now have to make sure that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12bbdbdb440119a0b86d2ee742ec1460cdb2c5b9/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs#L709 doesn't have any arm that introduces a user type annotation except for `PatKind::Binding`.
…86, r=bjorn3

Fix arch flag on i686-apple-darwin

i686-apple-darwin should use `-arch i386` instead of `-arch i686`
Bump `cfg-if` to `1.0` in rustc crates

When `packed_simd_2` and `getrandom` are updated to newer versions, we will no longer have a dependency on old `cfg_if` versions.
…laumeGomez

rustdoc: simplify section anchor CSS

Since f50bf86 changed anchors to be always positioned absolute, specifying it on hover as well is redundant.
…jackh726

Avoid going through the happy path in case of non-fn builtin calls

No functional change, just doing an early return. The removed comment is not applicable anymore, not every node needs type bindings in the error case. At best this would have been needed to avoid ICEs, but afaict this can't happen anymore today, as we do fallible checks.
…-Simulacrum

Remove unused `check-stage2-T-arm-linux-androideabi-H-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` make rule

It's not used anywhere in CI, and it seems of questionable use. It was first added in 0e272de, which looks like it's just intended for CI, not as a user-facing feature.
@rustbot rustbot added T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 20, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2022

📌 Commit ae90226 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 20, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2022

⌛ Testing commit ae90226 with merge ad91f09f5be8b110eb94e5b8fc0eccc8bb2b675a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 21, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry selfhosted runner timeout

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 21, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2022

⌛ Testing commit ae90226 with merge b9481a091a26af7c75ac0ce2d1f6c0a43b9b5c8e...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 21, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 21, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2022

⌛ Testing commit ae90226 with merge b569c9d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing b569c9d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 21, 2022
@bors bors merged commit b569c9d into rust-lang:master Dec 21, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 21, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b569c9d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet