Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flatten rustc and rustc_trans module hierarchy slightly. #32432

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 27, 2016

Conversation

eddyb
Copy link
Member

@eddyb eddyb commented Mar 22, 2016

The following moves were made, in the name of sanity/simplicity:

  • rustc::middle::{cfg, infer, traits, ty} to rustc::{cfg, infer, traits, ty}
  • rustc::middle::subst to rustc::ty::subst
  • rustc_trans::trans::* to rustc_trans::*
  • rustc_trans::save to rustc_save_analysis (cc @nrc)

I've rebased a larger WIP branch on top of this and the only conflicts were in imports, but YMMV.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

👍 from me.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 22, 2016

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #32156) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 23, 2016

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #32410) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@nrc
Copy link
Member

nrc commented Mar 24, 2016

👍 from me too.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@eddyb I guess I didn't say r=me explicitly, but r=me

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2016

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #32346) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Mar 25, 2016

@bors r=nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2016

📌 Commit 4f75da9 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2016

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #32428) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Mar 25, 2016

@bors r=nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2016

📌 Commit 7eb0547 has been approved by nikomatsakis

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2016
Flatten rustc and rustc_trans module hierarchy slightly.

The following moves were made, in the name of sanity/simplicity:
* `rustc::middle::{cfg, infer, traits, ty}` to `rustc::{cfg, infer, traits, ty}`
* `rustc::middle::subst` to `rustc::ty::subst`
* `rustc_trans::trans::*` to `rustc_trans::*`
* `rustc_trans::save` to `rustc_save_analysis` (cc @nrc)

I've rebased a larger WIP branch on top of this and the only conflicts were in imports, but YMMV.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2016
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2016

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #32293) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Mar 26, 2016

@bors r=nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2016

📌 Commit 17813e5 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Mar 26, 2016

@bors p=1 This has seen way too many rebases this week and it's just going to get worse.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 17813e5 with merge 0fac6d8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-musl-64-opt

@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Mar 26, 2016

@bors r=nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2016

📌 Commit 035a645 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 27, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 035a645 with merge d5a91e6...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2016
Flatten rustc and rustc_trans module hierarchy slightly.

The following moves were made, in the name of sanity/simplicity:
* `rustc::middle::{cfg, infer, traits, ty}` to `rustc::{cfg, infer, traits, ty}`
* `rustc::middle::subst` to `rustc::ty::subst`
* `rustc_trans::trans::*` to `rustc_trans::*`
* `rustc_trans::save` to `rustc_save_analysis` (cc @nrc)

I've rebased a larger WIP branch on top of this and the only conflicts were in imports, but YMMV.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants