Treat MultiDecorators as a special case of MultiModifiers
#34446
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@bors: r+ |
|
📌 Commit 972a578 has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit 972a578 with merge c4bccb0... |
|
⛄ The build was interrupted to prioritize another pull request. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #34424) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
jseyfried
force-pushed
the
refactor_decorators
branch
from
972a578
to
62f863c
Compare
jseyfried
force-pushed
the
refactor_decorators
branch
from
62f863c
to
a595ffa
Compare
|
@bors r=nrc |
|
📌 Commit a595ffa has been approved by |
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2016
Treat `MultiDecorator`s as a special case of `MultiModifier`s This deals with rust-lang#32950 by using @durka's [option 1](rust-lang#33769 (comment)). r? @nrc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This deals with #32950 by using @durka's option 1.
r? @nrc