Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #45386

Merged
merged 19 commits into from Oct 19, 2017
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #45386

merged 19 commits into from Oct 19, 2017

Conversation

bgermann and others added 11 commits October 17, 2017 15:53
Unfortunately, rust-lang#45255 does not quite cut it,
so use a different approach to have Solaris 10 compatibility
by tricking libbacktrace's autoconf tests.
The sysroot download routine is slightly changed, too.
All tests should now have annotation for *why* they're ignored on emscripten. A
few tests no longer need such an annotation as well!

Closes rust-lang#41299
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Oct 19, 2017

@bors r+ p=9

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2017

📌 Commit 5f13ec9 has been approved by kennytm

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 19, 2017
Make Solaris builder compatible with Solaris 10 retry

Unfortunately, rust-lang#45255 does not quite cut it,
so use a different approach to have Solaris 10 compatibility
by tricking libbacktrace's autoconf tests.
The sysroot download routine is slightly changed, too.
…r=steveklabnik

added examples of closures for str::find

This is an attempt to fix rust-lang#45327

r? @steveklabnik
…komatsakis

test: Update Emscripten failures/passing

All tests should now have annotation for *why* they're ignored on emscripten. A
few tests no longer need such an annotation as well!

Closes rust-lang#41299
…-config-option, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Remove --enable-rustbuild config option from an example

`--enable-rustbuild` is no longer recognized by the configure script. Also I think we should use `./configure` and `./x.py` instead of `configure` and `../x.py`.
…mulacrum

Allow passing a path with tilde to the configure script

Currently `./configure --local-rust-root=~/.cargo --enable-local-rebuild` fails with
 ```
Exception: no cargo executable found at `~/.cargo//bin/cargo`
```
…Mark-Simulacrum

Fix typos in src/librustc/README.md
…EADME, r=kennytm

Fix typos in librustc/ty/README.md
rustbuild: fix dist in debug mode

In debug mode, the artifacts are placed in "debug", so don't hardcode "release" and use our helper to get the right directory name
@kennytm kennytm changed the title Rollup of 9 pull requests Rollup of 8 pull requests Oct 19, 2017
@kennytm
Copy link
Member Author

kennytm commented Oct 19, 2017

@bors r+

Removed #45080, not intended for rollup.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2017

📌 Commit 4371862 has been approved by kennytm

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2017
Rollup of 8 pull requests

- Successful merges: #45343, #45349, #45352, #45374, #45375, #45376, #45377, #45382
- Failed merges:
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 4371862 with merge 439f752...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 19, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: kennytm
Pushing 439f752 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 4371862 into rust-lang:master Oct 19, 2017
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants