[doc] note the special type inference handling for shift ops #49915
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
Looks like a reasonable documentation update to me. Could I get confirmation from @rust-lang/lang on the accuracy of the comment? |
|
FWiW, I've also written up a blog post on the distinction and how I happened upon it. |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit a7e3d85 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
reviewed
Apr 12, 2018
src/libcore/ops/bit.rs
Outdated
| @@ -315,7 +315,12 @@ macro_rules! bitxor_impl { | |||
|
|
|||
| bitxor_impl! { bool usize u8 u16 u32 u64 u128 isize i8 i16 i32 i64 i128 } | |||
|
|
|||
| /// The left shift operator `<<`. | |||
| /// The left shift operator `<<`. Note that because this trait is implemented | |||
| /// for all integer types with multiple right-hand-side types, typeck has | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/typeck/Rust's type checker/
src/libcore/ops/bit.rs
Outdated
| @@ -417,7 +422,12 @@ macro_rules! shl_impl_all { | |||
|
|
|||
| shl_impl_all! { u8 u16 u32 u64 u128 usize i8 i16 i32 i64 isize i128 } | |||
|
|
|||
| /// The right shift operator `>>`. | |||
| /// The right shift operator `>>`. Note that because this trait is implemented | |||
| /// for all integer types with multiple right-hand-side types, typeck has | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/typeck/Rust's type checker/
|
On April 12, 2018 3:53:02 PM PDT, Mazdak Farrokhzad ***@***.***> wrote:
Centril commented on this pull request.
We probably want to avoid the jargon typeck in user facing
documentation.
> @@ -315,7 +315,12 @@ macro_rules! bitxor_impl {
bitxor_impl! { bool usize u8 u16 u32 u64 u128 isize i8 i16 i32 i64 i128
}
-/// The left shift operator `<<`.
+/// The left shift operator `<<`. Note that because this trait is
implemented
+/// for all integer types with multiple right-hand-side types, typeck
has
s/typeck/Rust's type checker/
> @@ -417,7 +422,12 @@ macro_rules! shl_impl_all {
shl_impl_all! { u8 u16 u32 u64 u128 usize i8 i16 i32 i64 isize i128 }
-/// The right shift operator `>>`.
+/// The right shift operator `>>`. Note that because this trait is
implemented
+/// for all integer types with multiple right-hand-side types, typeck
has
s/typeck/Rust's type checker/
Good point!
|
|
@kennytm can I |
|
@llogiq I've removed this PR from the rollup. Feel free to change anything. |
|
I've replaced 'typeck' with 'the Rust type checker'. This should now be good to go. |
|
@bors r=joshtriplett |
|
📌 Commit b744e3d has been approved by |
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2018
[doc] note the special type inference handling for shift ops This adds a note to the docs about the difference between the shift ops and the corresponding trait methods when it comes to type inference.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a note to the docs about the difference between the shift ops and the corresponding trait methods when it comes to type inference.