Update rustdoc book to suggest using Termination trait instead of hidden ‘foo’ function #51183
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
steveklabnik
suggested changes
May 31, 2018
|
|
||
| ## Using `?` in doc tests | ||
|
|
||
| A complete error handling is often not useful in your example, as it would add |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would change this slightly. This isn't wrong, but sounds a bit strange.
In your examples, handling all errors is not often useful, as it would add
|
Ping from triage @steveklabnik! This PR needs your review. |
steveklabnik
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2018
|
Thank you! @bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit efa8de8 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
🔒 Merge conflict |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@teiesti can you please rebase this PR on top of the latest master? |
|
Done. |
|
@steveklabnik this should be approved again. |
|
@bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 089da06 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2018
…=steveklabnik Update rustdoc book to suggest using Termination trait instead of hidden ‘foo’ function Closes rust-lang#50721. I suggest that someone double-checks my English since I am not a native speaker. r? @steveklabnik
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2018
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #50852 (Add doc comment to hiding portions of code example) - #51183 (Update rustdoc book to suggest using Termination trait instead of hidden ‘foo’ function) - #51255 (Fix confusing error message for sub_instant) - #51256 (Fix crate-name option in rustdoc) - #51308 (Check array indices in constant propagation) - #51343 (test: Ignore some problematic tests on sparc and sparc64) - #51358 (Tests that #39963 is fixed on MIR borrowck) Failed merges:
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #50721.
I suggest that someone double-checks my English since I am not a native speaker.
r? @steveklabnik