Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[librustdoc] Disable spellcheck for search field #55161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2018

Conversation

akxcv
Copy link
Contributor

@akxcv akxcv commented Oct 17, 2018

This disables spellchecking for the search field in the rustdoc web interface.

As someone who uses Safari to browse through Rust docs, spellchecking gets really annoying.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @QuietMisdreavus (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 17, 2018
@QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Member

Oh nice! This makes perfect sense to me, since the things you type in there wind up being abbreviations, or combinations of words, or something else that's likely to not be in a spellcheck dictionary. I'd like to have @GuillaumeGomez take a look, but otherwise i like this.

@akxcv
Copy link
Contributor Author

akxcv commented Oct 17, 2018

Side note: perhaps it would be a good idea to move the HTML to an actual HTML file and use include_str! to include it into Rust code? This would enable syntax highlighting and we wouldn't need to escape double quotes.

If this is a good idea, I'm happy to submit a separate PR for this.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@akxcv It's currently not really a good idea. We're currently in a (veeeeeery slow) code improvement process in rustdoc. Once done, we'll need to think on a few things like:

  • reduce HTML output size
  • minimize HTML content in rust code as much as possible
  • write a generic "output type" so rustdoc can generate other things than HTML as well.

It'll come, but we don't know when. :)

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

And I forgot: thanks for the PR, looks good to me (and I learned something new, didn't know about this option)!

@bors: r=QuietMisdreavus,GuillaumeGomez rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 17, 2018

📌 Commit c55e1e6 has been approved by QuietMisdreavus,GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 17, 2018
@akxcv
Copy link
Contributor Author

akxcv commented Oct 17, 2018

We're currently in a (veeeeeery slow) code improvement process in rustdoc.

I'd love to learn more about it! Where can I find a roadmap or something?

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2018
…=QuietMisdreavus,GuillaumeGomez

[librustdoc] Disable spellcheck for search field

This disables spellchecking for the search field in the rustdoc web interface.

As someone who uses Safari to browse through Rust docs, spellchecking gets really annoying.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2018
Rollup of 18 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #54646 (improve documentation on std::thread::sleep)
 - #54933 (Cleanup the rest of codegen_llvm)
 - #54964 (Run both lldb and gdb tests)
 - #55016 (Deduplicate some code and compile-time values around vtables)
 - #55031 (Improve verify_llvm_ir config option)
 - #55050 (doc std::fmt: the Python inspiration is already mentioned in precedin…)
 - #55077 (rustdoc: Use dyn keyword when rendering dynamic traits)
 - #55080 (Detect if access to localStorage is forbidden by the user's browser)
 - #55090 (regression test for move out of borrow via pattern)
 - #55102 (resolve: Do not skip extern prelude during speculative resolution)
 - #55104 (Add test for #34229)
 - #55111 ([Rustc Book] Explain --cfg's arguments)
 - #55122 (Cleanup mir/borrowck)
 - #55127 (Remove HybridBitSet::dummy)
 - #55128 (Fix LLVMRustInlineAsmVerify return type mismatch)
 - #55142 (miri: layout should not affect CTFE checks (outside of validation))
 - #55151 (Cleanup nll)
 - #55161 ([librustdoc] Disable spellcheck for search field)
@bors bors merged commit c55e1e6 into rust-lang:master Oct 18, 2018
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Euh... @QuietMisdreavus and I are the roadmap? XD

@akxcv akxcv deleted the rustdoc/disable-spellcheck branch October 19, 2018 12:38
@QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Member

Sadly the roadmap is effectively "what the two of us are most bothered by at the moment". I'd love to get a discussion together to try and focus our development. I haven't taken the opportunity to sketch something out, though.

@akxcv
Copy link
Contributor Author

akxcv commented Oct 19, 2018

I'd be happy to participate! I can't promise anything, but I think I might be able to help somewhat. Should I find you on IRC or something?

@QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Member

We're most active on Discord nowadays, if you want to hop on and have a chat. A real roadmap chat will probably happen in a GitHub issue somewhere, but for something slightly more synchronous, that's the current best option.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants