Add lint for 2229 migrations #80629

arora-aman · 2021-01-02T20:31:28Z

Implements the first for RFC 2229 where we make the decision to migrate a root variable based on if the type of the variable needs Drop and if the root variable would be moved into the closure when the feature isn't enabled.

r? @nikomatsakis

rust-log-analyzer · 2021-01-02T21:01:51Z

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-9 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

.................................................................................................... 9000/11242
.................................................................................................... 9100/11242
.................................................................................................... 9200/11242
......................................i......i...................................................... 9300/11242
.............................................................................iiiiii..iiiiii.i....... 9400/11242
.................................................................................................... 9600/11242
.................................................................................................... 9700/11242
.................................................................................................... 9800/11242
.................................................................................................... 9900/11242
---
Suite("src/test/assembly") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Assembly" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
Check compiletest suite=assembly mode=assembly (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 27 tests
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Suite("src/test/incremental") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Incremental" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
 finished in 0.087 seconds
Check compiletest suite=incremental mode=incremental (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
---
 finished in 11.790 seconds
Check compiletest suite=debuginfo mode=debuginfo (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

running 116 tests
iiiiiiiiii.i.i..i..i..ii....i..i...ii..........iiii.........i.....i...i.......ii.i.ii.....iiii.....i 100/116
test result: ok. 78 passed; 0 failed; 38 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 2.53s

 finished in 2.619 seconds
Suite("src/test/ui-fulldeps") not skipped for "bootstrap::test::UiFullDeps" -- not in ["src/tools/tidy"]
---
running 80 tests
i.iF...i......i...........ii......................i.............i...............
failures:

---- src/builtin.rs - builtin::DISJOINT_CAPTURE_DROP_REORDER (line 2953) stdout ----
error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
17 |     let c = || {
   |  ___________^
18 | |      let x = p.x;
18 | |      let x = p.x;
19 | |   };
   | |___^
   |
note: the lint level is defined here
  --> src/builtin.rs:2954:9
   |
2  | #![deny(disjoint_capture_drop_reorder)]
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   = note: let (p) = (p);
error: aborting due to previous error

Couldn't compile the test.

---

error: test failed, to rerun pass '--doc'


command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "test" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "-Zbinary-dep-depinfo" "-j" "16" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--features" " llvm" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/compiler/rustc/Cargo.toml" "-p" "rustc_lint_defs" "--" "--quiet"


failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap --stage 2 test --exclude src/tools/tidy
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:27:10

bors · 2021-01-13T17:46:05Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #76219) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

nikomatsakis

By and large, this looks great. I left a few nits.

compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs

nikomatsakis · 2021-01-16T10:51:19Z

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/upvar.rs

+        self.compute_min_captures(closure_def_id, delegate.capture_information);
+
+        let closure_hir_id = self.tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id);
+        if should_do_migration_analysis(self.tcx, closure_hir_id) {


nit: can we pull the body of this if out into a separate method?

nikomatsakis · 2021-01-16T10:56:03Z

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/upvar.rs

+
+            let is_moved = root_var_min_capture_list
+                .iter()
+                .find(|capture| matches!(capture.info.capture_kind, ty::UpvarCapture::ByValue(_)))


nit: you can use .any() instead =)

nikomatsakis · 2021-01-16T10:57:00Z

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/upvar.rs

+            // 2. If we only capture one path starting at the root variable, it's still possible
+            //    that it isn't the root variable completely.
+            if is_moved
+                && ((root_var_min_capture_list.len() > 1)


Nit: maybe simpler to do root_var_min_capture_list.iter().any(|l| l.place.projections.len() > 0) ?

would we ever capture a and a.b? no, right?

nikomatsakis · 2021-01-16T10:57:55Z

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/upvar.rs

+    let (level, _) =
+        tcx.lint_level_at_node(lint::builtin::DISJOINT_CAPTURE_DROP_REORDER, closure_id);
+
+    !matches!(level, lint::Level::Allow)


I wonder if we want to consider the Edition too .. e.g., in Edition 2021, maybe this lint should be a no-op

Not important

When I initially wrote this the PR to introduce 2021 edition was in progress, so I didn't think too much at the time. I don't know if we should just ignore lints that are no-op without letting the user know about it.

nikomatsakis · 2021-01-16T11:01:13Z

src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop.rs

+
+// Test migration analysis in case of Drop + Non Drop aggregates.
+// Note we need migration here only because the non-copy (because Drop type) is captured,
+// otherwise we won't need to, since we can get away with just by ref capture in that case.


We don't really need migration here, right? The only drop that will run is still going to run at the same point either way (when the closure is dropped). I agree the analysis as implemented in this PR would be expected to warn, it's just that it's overly conservative.

We don't need migrations here, but this PR doesn't implement the precise path yet. I can add another String to the tuple so that we don't need to move the test when I implement the precise path.

rust-log-analyzer · 2021-01-19T08:28:01Z

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

configure: rust.channel         := nightly
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
configure: 
---
Checking which error codes lack tests...
Found 435 error codes
Found 0 error codes with no tests
Done!
tidy error: /checkout/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs: too many lines (3039) (add `// ignore-tidy-filelength` to the file to suppress this error)
some tidy checks failed

command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/tidy" "/checkout" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/checkout/obj/build"
expected success, got: exit code: 1

nikomatsakis · 2021-01-27T21:07:09Z

@bors r+

bors · 2021-01-27T21:07:11Z

📌 Commit eea0668100c15869891597eec40c0ac2a1b84712 has been approved by nikomatsakis

bors · 2021-01-28T12:33:28Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #81461) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

bors · 2021-01-29T04:28:54Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #81493) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

nikomatsakis · 2021-01-30T09:59:23Z

@bors r+

@bors delegate+

bors · 2021-01-30T09:59:25Z

📌 Commit 11abaa1 has been approved by nikomatsakis

bors · 2021-01-30T09:59:26Z

✌️ @arora-aman can now approve this pull request

m-ou-se · 2021-01-30T12:19:44Z

Cargo.lock

@@ -5388,7 +5388,7 @@ dependencies = [
 "chrono",
 "lazy_static",
 "matchers",
- "parking_lot 0.11.0",
+ "parking_lot 0.9.0",


Was this change to Cargo.lock intentional?

…sakis Add lint for 2229 migrations Implements the first for RFC 2229 where we make the decision to migrate a root variable based on if the type of the variable needs Drop and if the root variable would be moved into the closure when the feature isn't enabled. r? `@nikomatsakis`

jonas-schievink · 2021-01-30T16:44:02Z

@bors r- based on #80629 (comment)

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/upvar.rs

- This allows us add fake information after handling migrations if needed. - Capture analysis also priortizes what we see earlier, which means fake information should go in last.

rust-log-analyzer · 2021-02-02T00:27:12Z

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-9 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

.................................................................................................... 1000/11335
...........................................................................i........................ 1100/11335
.................................................................................................... 1200/11335
.................................................................................................... 1300/11335
F....F..........................................................ii.i.............i.................. 1400/11335
.................................................................................................... 1600/11335
.................................................................................................... 1700/11335
.....................................................................................i.............. 1800/11335
.................................................................................................... 1900/11335
---
.................................................................................................... 9100/11335
.................................................................................................... 9200/11335
.................................................................................................... 9300/11335
................i......i............................................................................ 9400/11335
........................................................iiiiiiiiiiii.i.............................. 9500/11335
.................................................................................................... 9700/11335
.................................................................................................... 9800/11335
.................................................................................................... 9900/11335
.................................................................................................... 10000/11335
---

---- [ui] ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop.rs stdout ----
diff of stderr:

- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
3    |
4 LL |       let c = || {

18    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
18    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
19    = note: drop(&(t, t1, t2));
20 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
23    |
24 LL |       let c = || {

33    |
33    |
34    = note: drop(&(t, t1));
35 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
38    |
39 LL |       let c = || {

47    |
47    |
48    = note: drop(&(t));
49 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
52    |
53 LL |       let c = || {

61    |
61    |
62    = note: drop(&(t));
63 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
66    |
67 LL |       let c = || {

75    |
75    |
76    = note: drop(&(t));
77 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
80    |
80    |
81 LL |       let c = move || {
88    |
88    |
89    = note: drop(&(t1, t));
90 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
93    |
94 LL |       let c = || {



The actual stderr differed from the expected stderr.
Actual stderr saved to /checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop/insignificant_drop.stderr
To update references, rerun the tests and pass the `--bless` flag
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop.rs`
error: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit code: 1
status: exit code: 1
command: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc" "/checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--error-format" "json" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zemit-future-incompat-report" "--emit" "metadata" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "--out-dir" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop" "-A" "unused" "-Crpath" "-O" "-Cdebuginfo=0" "-Zunstable-options" "-Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop/auxiliary"
------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------
stderr:
stderr:
------------------------------------------
error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t, t1, t2));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         let _t1 = t1.0;
LL | |         let _t2 = t2.0;
LL | |     };
   |
note: the lint level is defined here
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/insignificant_drop.rs:1:9
   |
   |
LL | #![deny(disjoint_capture_drop_reorder)]
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   = note: drop(&(t, t1, t2));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t, t1));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         let _t1 = t1.0;
LL | |         let _t2 = t2;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t, t1));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         println!("{}", t1.1);
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         let _t1 = t1.0;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         let _s = s.0;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
   |
LL |       let c = move || {
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t1, t));
LL | |         println!("{} {}", t1.1, t.1);
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t1, t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
   |
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));
error: aborting due to 7 previous errors


------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------


---- [ui] ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs stdout ----


- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
3    |
4 LL |       let c = || {

18    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
18    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
19    = note: drop(&(t, t1, t2));
20 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
23    |
24 LL |       let c = || {

33    |
33    |
Some tests failed in compiletest suite=ui mode=ui host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
34    = note: drop(&(t, t1));
35 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
38    |
39 LL |       let c = || {

47    |
47    |
48    = note: drop(&(t));
49 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
52    |
53 LL |       let c = || {

60    |
60    |
61    = note: drop(&(t));
62 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
65    |
66 LL |       let c = || {

73    |
73    |
74    = note: drop(&(t));
75 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
78    |
79 LL |       let c = || {

86    |
86    |
87    = note: drop(&(t));
88 
- error: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
+ error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
91    |
91    |
92 LL |       let c = move || {

The actual stderr differed from the expected stderr.
Actual stderr saved to /checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop/significant_drop.stderr
Actual stderr saved to /checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop/significant_drop.stderr
To update references, rerun the tests and pass the `--bless` flag
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs`
error: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit code: 1
status: exit code: 1
command: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc" "/checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--error-format" "json" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zemit-future-incompat-report" "--emit" "metadata" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "--out-dir" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop" "-A" "unused" "-Crpath" "-O" "-Cdebuginfo=0" "-Zunstable-options" "-Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-L" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop/auxiliary"
------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------
stderr:
stderr:
------------------------------------------
error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:24:13
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t, t1, t2));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         let _t1 = t1.0;
LL | |         let _t2 = t2.0;
LL | |     };
   |
note: the lint level is defined here
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:1:9
   |
   |
LL | #![deny(disjoint_capture_drop_reorder)]
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   = note: drop(&(t, t1, t2));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:42:13
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t, t1));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         let _t1 = t1.0;
LL | |         let _t2 = t2;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t, t1));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:58:13
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |         println!("{:?}", t1.1);
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:75:13
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:90:13
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.0;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:105:13
LL |       let c = || {
   |  _____________^
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t));
LL | |         let _t = t.1;
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t));

error: drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
  --> /checkout/src/test/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/migrations/significant_drop.rs:120:13
   |
LL |       let c = move || {
   |  _____________^
LL | |     //~^ERROR: Drop order affected for closure because of `capture_disjoint_fields`
LL | |     //~| NOTE: drop(&(t1, t));
LL | |         println!("{:?} {:?}", t1.1, t.1);
LL | |     };
   |
   |
   = note: drop(&(t1, t));
error: aborting due to 7 previous errors


------------------------------------------
---
test result: FAILED. 11245 passed; 2 failed; 88 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 136.91s



command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/compiletest" "--compile-lib-path" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib" "--run-lib-path" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "--rustc-path" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc" "--src-base" "/checkout/src/test/ui" "--build-base" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui" "--stage-id" "stage2-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--suite" "ui" "--mode" "ui" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--host" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--llvm-filecheck" "/usr/lib/llvm-9/bin/FileCheck" "--nodejs" "/usr/bin/node" "--host-rustcflags" "-Crpath -O -Cdebuginfo=0 -Zunstable-options  -Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "--target-rustcflags" "-Crpath -O -Cdebuginfo=0 -Zunstable-options  -Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "--docck-python" "/usr/bin/python3" "--lldb-python" "/usr/bin/python3" "--gdb" "/usr/bin/gdb" "--quiet" "--llvm-version" "9.0.0" "--llvm-components" "aarch64 aarch64asmparser aarch64codegen aarch64desc aarch64disassembler aarch64info aarch64utils aggressiveinstcombine all all-targets amdgpu amdgpuasmparser amdgpucodegen amdgpudesc amdgpudisassembler amdgpuinfo amdgpuutils analysis arm armasmparser armcodegen armdesc armdisassembler arminfo armutils asmparser asmprinter avr avrasmparser avrcodegen avrdesc avrdisassembler avrinfo binaryformat bitreader bitstreamreader bitwriter bpf bpfasmparser bpfcodegen bpfdesc bpfdisassembler bpfinfo codegen core coroutines coverage debuginfocodeview debuginfodwarf debuginfogsym debuginfomsf debuginfopdb demangle dlltooldriver engine executionengine fuzzmutate globalisel hexagon hexagonasmparser hexagoncodegen hexagondesc hexagondisassembler hexagoninfo instcombine instrumentation interpreter ipo irreader jitlink lanai lanaiasmparser lanaicodegen lanaidesc lanaidisassembler lanaiinfo libdriver lineeditor linker lto mc mca mcdisassembler mcjit mcparser mips mipsasmparser mipscodegen mipsdesc mipsdisassembler mipsinfo mirparser msp430 msp430asmparser msp430codegen msp430desc msp430disassembler msp430info native nativecodegen nvptx nvptxcodegen nvptxdesc nvptxinfo objcarcopts object objectyaml option orcjit passes perfjitevents powerpc powerpcasmparser powerpccodegen powerpcdesc powerpcdisassembler powerpcinfo profiledata remarks riscv riscvasmparser riscvcodegen riscvdesc riscvdisassembler riscvinfo riscvutils runtimedyld scalaropts selectiondag sparc sparcasmparser sparccodegen sparcdesc sparcdisassembler sparcinfo support symbolize systemz systemzasmparser systemzcodegen systemzdesc systemzdisassembler systemzinfo tablegen target textapi transformutils vectorize webassembly webassemblyasmparser webassemblycodegen webassemblydesc webassemblydisassembler webassemblyinfo windowsmanifest x86 x86asmparser x86codegen x86desc x86disassembler x86info x86utils xcore xcorecodegen xcoredesc xcoredisassembler xcoreinfo xray" "--system-llvm" "--cc" "" "--cxx" "" "--cflags" "" "--adb-path" "adb" "--adb-test-dir" "/data/tmp/work" "--android-cross-path" "" "--color" "always"


failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap --stage 2 test --exclude src/tools/tidy
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:15:45

arora-aman · 2021-02-02T04:45:44Z

Updated PR to handle issues some conflict with #80092

arora-aman · 2021-02-02T04:45:54Z

@bors r+

bors · 2021-02-02T04:45:55Z

📌 Commit 84f0a0a has been approved by arora-aman

arora-aman · 2021-02-02T04:46:14Z

@bors r=nikomatsakis

bors · 2021-02-02T04:46:16Z

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

There's another pull request that is currently being tested, blocking this pull request: Update cargo #81651

bors · 2021-02-02T04:46:17Z

📌 Commit 84f0a0a has been approved by nikomatsakis

…as-schievink Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80629 (Add lint for 2229 migrations) - rust-lang#81022 (Add Frames Iterator for Backtrace) - rust-lang#81481 (move some tests) - rust-lang#81485 (Add some tests for associated-type-bounds issues) - rust-lang#81492 (rustdoc: Note why `rustdoc::html::markdown` is public) - rust-lang#81577 (const_evaluatable: consider sub-expressions to be evaluatable) - rust-lang#81599 (Implement `TrustedLen` for `Fuse<I: TrustedLen>`) - rust-lang#81608 (Improve handling of spans around macro result parse errors) - rust-lang#81609 (Remove the remains of query categories) - rust-lang#81630 (Fix overflowing text on mobile when sidebar is displayed) - rust-lang#81631 (Remove unneeded `mut` variable) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Original message: Rollup merge of rust-lang#80629 - sexxi-goose:migrations_1, r=nikomatsakis Add lint for 2229 migrations Implements the first for RFC 2229 where we make the decision to migrate a root variable based on if the type of the variable needs Drop and if the root variable would be moved into the closure when the feature isn't enabled. r? `@nikomatsakis`

rust-highfive assigned nikomatsakis Jan 2, 2021

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 2, 2021

arora-aman mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2021

Implement migrations for RFC 2229 rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#35

Closed

3 tasks

nikomatsakis requested changes Jan 16, 2021

View reviewed changes

arora-aman force-pushed the migrations_1 branch from 497100e to b75dd0d Compare January 19, 2021 08:15

arora-aman force-pushed the migrations_1 branch 3 times, most recently from f6e6601 to eea0668 Compare January 26, 2021 09:39

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 27, 2021

bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 28, 2021

arora-aman force-pushed the migrations_1 branch from eea0668 to d8e89fb Compare January 29, 2021 03:31

arora-aman force-pushed the migrations_1 branch from d8e89fb to 11abaa1 Compare January 29, 2021 04:51

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 30, 2021

m-ou-se reviewed Jan 30, 2021

View reviewed changes

m-ou-se mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2021

Rollup of 11 pull requests #81553

Closed

bors added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Jan 31, 2021

camelid added A-closures Area: closures (`|args| { .. }`) A-lint Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut. labels Feb 1, 2021

camelid reviewed Feb 1, 2021

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/upvar.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

arora-aman added 3 commits January 31, 2021 23:21

Add lint for 2229 migrations

bf4bdd9

Process mentioned upvars for analysis first pass after ExprUseVisitor

d3e8501

- This allows us add fake information after handling migrations if needed. - Capture analysis also priortizes what we see earlier, which means fake information should go in last.

Migrations first pass

cc5e6db

arora-aman force-pushed the migrations_1 branch from 5a3b85c to d96041b Compare February 1, 2021 23:50

arora-aman added 4 commits February 1, 2021 22:01

Tests for 2229 lint

3c71a7b

Mark the lint doc as compile_fail

caf06bf

PR fixup

8f15cc1

New migration

84f0a0a

arora-aman force-pushed the migrations_1 branch from d96041b to 84f0a0a Compare February 2, 2021 03:52

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 2, 2021

jonas-schievink mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2021

Rollup of 11 pull requests #81660

Merged

bors merged commit a188791 into rust-lang:master Feb 2, 2021

rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Feb 2, 2021

rust-timer mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2021

[DO NOT MERGE] perf-test for #80629 #81933

Closed

m-ou-se mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2021

🎉 Rust 2021 celebration and thanks #88623

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Add lint for 2229 migrations #80629

Add lint for 2229 migrations #80629

arora-aman commented Jan 2, 2021 •

edited

Loading

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 2, 2021

bors commented Jan 13, 2021

nikomatsakis left a comment

nikomatsakis Jan 16, 2021

arora-aman Jan 17, 2021

nikomatsakis Jan 16, 2021

arora-aman Jan 17, 2021

nikomatsakis Jan 16, 2021

arora-aman Jan 17, 2021

nikomatsakis Jan 16, 2021

nikomatsakis Jan 16, 2021

arora-aman Jan 17, 2021

nikomatsakis Jan 16, 2021

arora-aman Jan 16, 2021

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 19, 2021

nikomatsakis commented Jan 27, 2021

bors commented Jan 27, 2021

bors commented Jan 28, 2021

bors commented Jan 29, 2021

nikomatsakis commented Jan 30, 2021

bors commented Jan 30, 2021

bors commented Jan 30, 2021

m-ou-se Jan 30, 2021

jonas-schievink commented Jan 30, 2021

rust-log-analyzer commented Feb 2, 2021

arora-aman commented Feb 2, 2021

arora-aman commented Feb 2, 2021

bors commented Feb 2, 2021

arora-aman commented Feb 2, 2021

bors commented Feb 2, 2021

bors commented Feb 2, 2021

Add lint for 2229 migrations #80629

Add lint for 2229 migrations #80629

Conversation

arora-aman commented Jan 2, 2021 • edited Loading

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 2, 2021

bors commented Jan 13, 2021

nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rust-log-analyzer commented Jan 19, 2021

nikomatsakis commented Jan 27, 2021

bors commented Jan 27, 2021

bors commented Jan 28, 2021

bors commented Jan 29, 2021

nikomatsakis commented Jan 30, 2021

bors commented Jan 30, 2021

bors commented Jan 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jonas-schievink commented Jan 30, 2021

rust-log-analyzer commented Feb 2, 2021

arora-aman commented Feb 2, 2021

arora-aman commented Feb 2, 2021

bors commented Feb 2, 2021

arora-aman commented Feb 2, 2021

bors commented Feb 2, 2021

bors commented Feb 2, 2021

arora-aman commented Jan 2, 2021 •

edited

Loading