Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #88084

Closed
wants to merge 14 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

@m-ou-se m-ou-se commented Aug 16, 2021

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

moxian and others added 14 commits July 16, 2021 03:45
Now that Cargo deduplicates diagnostics from different targets, this doesn't flood the console with
duplicate errors.

Note that this doesn't add `--all-targets` in `Builder::cargo` directly because `impl Step for Std`
actually wants to omit `--all-targets` the first time while it's still building libtest.

When passed `--all-targets`, this warns that the option isn't needed, but still continues to compile.
Also fixed capitalization of documentation
The currently pinned version doesn't compile with the latest rustc nightly
Co-authored-by: Eric Huss <eric@huss.org>
Co-authored-by: inquisitivecrystal <22333129+inquisitivecrystal@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Rousskov <mark.simulacrum@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Giger <danielg3432@gmail.com>
[rustdoc] Copy only item path to clipboard rather than full `use` statement.

The (somewhat) recent addition of the "copy item import to clipboard" button is extremely nice.

However, i tend to write my code with fully qualified paths wherever feasible and only resort to `use` statements as a refactoring pass. This makes the "copy to clipboard" workflow awkward to use, as i would be copy-pasting that as, say

```rust
impl use std::ops::Add; for MyType {
```

and then go back  and remove the `use ` and `;`.

This PR removes the `use ;` decorations, making it much nicer to use for fully-qualified items. I argue, however, that this does not noticeably degrade experience for those who prefer to import items, since the hard part about those is getting the path right, and writing the `use ;` decoration can be done by hand with little effort.
…bini

Adding explicit notice of lack of documentation for Tier 2 Platforms

Fixing: rust-lang/rustup#2788
…pans, r=cjgillot

Detect fake spans in non_fmt_panic lint.

This addresses rust-lang#87621

Some proc_macros claim that the user wrote all of the tokens it outputs, by applying a span from the input to all of the produced tokens. That can result in confusing suggestions, as in rust-lang#87621. This is a simple patch that avoids suggesting anything for `panic!("{}")` if the span of `"{}"` and `panic!(..)` are identical, which is normally not possible.
…mulacrum

Enable `--all-targets` for `x.py check` unconditionally

Now that Cargo deduplicates diagnostics from different targets, this doesn't flood the console with
duplicate errors.

Note that this doesn't add `--all-targets` in `Builder::cargo` directly because `impl Step for Std`
actually wants to omit `--all-targets` the first time while it's still building libtest.

When passed `--all-targets`, this warns that the option isn't needed, but still continues to compile.

Fixes rust-lang#87846.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Assign FIXMEs to me and remove obsolete ones

Also fixed capitalization of documentation

We also don't need to transform predicates to be non-const since we basically ignore const predicates in non-const contexts.

r? ````@oli-obk````
…-Simulacrum

Update redox_syscall

The currently pinned version doesn't compile with the latest rustc nightly

cc `@jackpot51`
…rk-Simulacrum

Update RELEASES.md for 1.55.0

Reopening rust-lang#87624 after some edits and a force-push caused GitHub to close the PR.
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Aug 16, 2021
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member Author

m-ou-se commented Aug 16, 2021

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2021

📌 Commit 7f8d072 has been approved by m-ou-se

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 16, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 7f8d072 with merge 4613828965ff855b275dd5f81fe75f6aaa128d68...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 16, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 16, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@m-ou-se m-ou-se closed this Aug 16, 2021
@m-ou-se m-ou-se deleted the rollup-lsrz82a branch August 16, 2021 21:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants