Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windows On ARM(ARM64) Support #362

Closed
slzKud opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Windows On ARM(ARM64) Support #362

slzKud opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@slzKud
Copy link

slzKud commented Oct 31, 2022

Hello! I recently purchased a Windows Dev Kit 2023 running the ARM64 version of Windows 11. Because Ditto is my commonly used software, I try to compile the source code and run it natively. After a few changes, Ditto is running fine.Ready to initiate Pull Requests.
图片
But I have a problem, the zlib used in the project is zlib-msvc installed from Nuget, and there is no arm64 version of zlib. So when I adapt, I will remove the zlib obtained from nuget and use the arm64 version of zlib compiled by myself.
So I want to confirm how this situation should be handled. My personal recommendation is to use a package manager such as vcpkg, or change the source/readme/action to use the independently compiled zlib library. I want to ask your opinion to see how you treat and deal with it, thank you!

@jglathe
Copy link
Contributor

jglathe commented Dec 18, 2022

Oops did the same apparently. See merge #376 . Made a (static) zlib from the original source. Anyway, next up would be to make it a nuget package and publish it. The dll also gets built, didn‘t want to mess with this before ditto was running natively on ARM64 Windows. Please see jglathe/zlib for the current state of work.

@slzKud
Copy link
Author

slzKud commented Dec 18, 2022

Nice! Thank you! I will close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants