Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Gap to use #11197 for building spkg docs #11198

Closed
jasongrout opened this issue Apr 14, 2011 · 6 comments
Closed

Update Gap to use #11197 for building spkg docs #11198

jasongrout opened this issue Apr 14, 2011 · 6 comments

Comments

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member

The GAP spkg (currently that from #7041) should be updated to include the changes from #11197.

(FWIW, #11197 currently "needs info", and there hasn't been progress on that ticket for a couple of month.)

Component: packages: standard

Reviewer: Dima Pasechnik

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11198

@jasongrout

This comment has been minimized.

@nexttime
Copy link
Mannequin

nexttime mannequin commented Mar 22, 2012

comment:2

Now referring to #7041 (which will provide a GAP 4.4.12.p7 spkg), just in case...

@nexttime

This comment has been minimized.

@nexttime

This comment has been minimized.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Dec 2, 2021

comment:8

outdated, should close

@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Dec 2, 2021
@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Dec 2, 2021

Reviewer: Dima Pasechnik

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants