Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some other embeddings for graph generators #11399

Closed
nathanncohen mannequin opened this issue May 29, 2011 · 10 comments
Closed

Some other embeddings for graph generators #11399

nathanncohen mannequin opened this issue May 29, 2011 · 10 comments

Comments

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented May 29, 2011

I wrote #11397 because I needed it, but as some other embeddings really looked alike, it would have been stupid not to fix them too :-)

Apply:

Nathann

CC: @rbeezer

Component: graph theory

Author: Nathann Cohen

Reviewer: Rob Beezer

Merged: sage-4.7.1.alpha3

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11399

@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin added this to the sage-4.7.1 milestone May 29, 2011
@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin added the s: needs review label May 29, 2011
@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented May 29, 2011

Attachment: trac_11399.patch.gz

@rbeezer

This comment has been minimized.

@rbeezer
Copy link
Mannequin

rbeezer mannequin commented May 29, 2011

comment:2

Nicer still.

Builds, applies, and performs nicely on 4.7.

I'm going to run tests, since it seems the patchbot has not done its thing yet, and then will flip this to positive review.

Do we now have all the Platonic solids embedded properly?

Rob

@rbeezer
Copy link
Mannequin

rbeezer mannequin commented May 29, 2011

Reviewer: Rob Beezer

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented May 30, 2011

comment:4

Do we now have all the Platonic solids embedded properly?

Hem... We are missing the .... cube :-D

I just wrote the embedding, but I wondered : is it better to append it to this patch, or to create another one ? :-)

Writing the cube's embedding is so much less interesting than the dodecahedron's ^^;

Nathann

@rbeezer
Copy link
Mannequin

rbeezer mannequin commented May 30, 2011

comment:5

Replying to @nathanncohen:

I just wrote the embedding, but I wondered : is it better to append it to this patch, or to create another one ? :-)

Either way, I guess. If I don't get to it today, it might sit until Sage Days (which perhaps argues for another ticket?).

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented May 30, 2011

comment:6

Attachment: trac_11399-cube.patch.gz

It was indeed a stupid question :-)

Nathann

@nathanncohen

This comment has been minimized.

@rbeezer
Copy link
Mannequin

rbeezer mannequin commented May 30, 2011

comment:8

Got it. Cube looks good as well. Passes long tests, applies to 4,7, etc, etc.

Thanks for filling in these details, or perhaps I should say,

"Thank-yoooouuuu!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" :-)

@jdemeyer
Copy link

jdemeyer commented Jun 8, 2011

Merged: sage-4.7.1.alpha3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants