Updating PolyBoRi to release 0.8.2 #13124

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-16T20:50:58Z

PolyBoRi's next minor release will be out soon.
There were no changes of the interface between PolyBoRi 0.8.2 and 0.8.1, so we just have to update the sources from here:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/polybori/files/polybori/0.8.2rc

PolyBoRi 0.8.2 is a bugfix release incorporating all previous patches from Sage.

Current spkg

Install http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dreyer/spkg/polybori-0.8.2.spkg

Upstream: None of the above - read trac for reasoning.

CC: @sagetrac-PolyBoRi @malb @burcin

Component: packages: standard

Author: Alexander Dreyer

Reviewer: Martin Albrecht

Merged: sage-5.2.beta1

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13124

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-16T20:57:18Z

comment:1

The spkg is in place now.

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-16T20:57:18Z

Author: AlexanderDreyer

malb · 2012-06-17T13:45:29Z

comment:2

installs fine
- doctests pass
- package look okay

Only issue: I think it's our policy not to have .p0 for fresh packages, but just the name. Can you drop the .p0?

malb · 2012-06-17T13:45:29Z

Reviewer: Martin Albrecht

malb · 2012-06-17T13:45:29Z

Changed author from AlexanderDreyer to Alexander Dreyer

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-17T19:50:40Z

comment:3

Replying to @malb:

Only issue: I think it's our policy not to have .p0 for fresh packages, but just the name. Can you drop the .p0?

No problem, the updated spkg (renamed and changed tag line in SPKG.txt) is in place, see above.

malb · 2012-06-18T08:35:09Z

comment:5

All done then. :)

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-19T08:44:56Z

comment:7

I just updated the spkg to include the following patch in the upstream sources:
https://bitbucket.org/brickenstein/polybori/changeset/b5c2173f7a43
The issue was discovered in #13133. I don't add .p0, since the patch will be in PolyBoRi 0.8.2's next rc.

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-19T08:46:26Z

comment:8

@malb Staying positive reviewed?

jdemeyer · 2012-06-19T08:49:23Z

comment:9

Please don't name the spkg version "0.8.2" if polybori-0.8.2 hasn't actually been released! If the upstream version is called "0.8.2rc1", then so should the Sage version be (including in SPKG.txt).

jdemeyer · 2012-06-19T08:49:23Z

Work Issues: version number

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-19T08:53:43Z

comment:11

We are currently co-developing. PolyBoRi 0.8.2 will be whatever the result of this ticket is.

jdemeyer · 2012-06-19T09:00:13Z

comment:12

That makes sense, you you should really make sure that the upstream polybori-0.8.2 is identical to the Sage polybori-0.8.2.

Believe me, I have seen this kind of problems in the past with other packages where the upstream version was close to, but not quite equal to the Sage version.

malb · 2012-06-19T09:02:39Z

comment:13

Replying to @jdemeyer:

Please don't name the spkg version "0.8.2" if polybori-0.8.2 hasn't actually been released! If the upstream version is called "0.8.2rc1", then so should the Sage version be (including in SPKG.txt).

Because packages like PolyBoRi (and e.g., M4RI) wait for Sage's tests to pass before releasing, this strategy would create unnecessary bureaucracy. We'd do a rcX, Sage includes the package, we another package which is the final.

malb · 2012-06-19T09:03:40Z

comment:14

Replying to @alexanderdreyer:

@malb Staying positive reviewed?

Yep.

jdemeyer · 2012-06-19T09:15:12Z

comment:15

Positive review then.

jdemeyer · 2012-06-19T09:15:12Z

Changed work issues from version number to none

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-19T09:42:00Z

comment:16

Understanding that spkgs could be messed up, I document the source matching here:

> md5sum *
7e077b1838ec7a80adf250d64ed17e38  polybori-0.8.2rc3.tar.gz
872cd541b398de44a602a058286d6a17  polybori-0.8.2.spkg
> mkdir orig; tar -C orig -xzf polybori-0.8.2rc3.tar.gz
> mkdir spkg; tar -C spkg -xjf polybori-0.8.2.spkg
> diff --recursive -u spkg/polybori-0.8.2/src/ orig/polybori-0.8.2/
Only in orig/polybori-0.8.2/: M4RI

vbraun · 2012-06-21T13:31:16Z

comment:17

I just noticed that polybori was the culprit for the mult_table0.png .. files, which is fixed in this version. So please update ;-)

jdemeyer · 2012-06-30T07:51:14Z

comment:18

Fails to build on hawk (OpenSolaris 06.2009-32):

polybori-0.8.2
====================================================
Extracting package /export/home/buildbot/build/sage/hawk-1/hawk_full/build/sage-5.2.beta0/spkg/standard/polybori-0.8.2.spkg
-rw-r--r--   1 buildbot other    13486080 Jun 29 22:30 /export/home/buildbot/build/sage/hawk-1/hawk_full/build/sage-5.2.beta0/spkg/standard/polybori-0.8.2.spkg
Finished extraction
****************************************************
Host system:
SunOS hawk 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc
****************************************************
C compiler: gcc
C compiler version:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11
Configured with: ../gcc-4.4-20100112/configure --with-as=/usr/local/binutils-2.20/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.3 20100112 (prerelease) (GCC) 
****************************************************
Starting build...
Removing old PolyBoRi install...
Done removing old PolyBoRi install.
Running build_polybori...
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
Platform:  sunos5
Platform:  sunos5
Platform:  sunos5
ValueError: too many values to unpack:
  File "/export/home/buildbot/build/sage/hawk-1/hawk_full/build/sage-5.2.beta0/spkg/build/polybori-0.8.2/src/SConstruct", line 483:
    (env, opts) = setup_env(defaultenv)
Error building PolyBoRi.

alexanderdreyer · 2012-06-30T14:16:55Z

comment:19

I fixed that issue and added an updated spkg at the same place.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dreyer/spkg/polybori-0.8.2.spkg
(The previous one archived to polybori-0.8.2.spkg.1)

jdemeyer · 2012-07-02T15:43:01Z

comment:20

The download link gives a 404 Not Found error.

jdemeyer · 2012-07-02T15:43:01Z

Work Issues: HTTP 404

alexanderdreyer · 2012-07-02T18:42:58Z

Changed work issues from HTTP 404 to none

alexanderdreyer · 2012-07-02T18:42:58Z

comment:21

Sorry, I'd accidentally put it to the wrong dir. Now it's at the correct url.

jdemeyer · 2012-07-06T09:25:44Z

comment:22

Compiles fine on hawk.

jdemeyer · 2012-07-07T22:31:05Z

Merged: sage-5.2.beta1

alexanderdreyer · 2012-07-09T13:06:36Z

comment:24

Just for documentation: the sources of polybori-0.8.2.spkg from sage-5.2.rc0 became release 0.8.2 at https://sourceforge.net/projects/polybori/files/polybori/0.8.2/:

> md5sum polybori-0.8.2.tar.gz polybori-0.8.2.spkg
82649420bae3275138469db6f19aac8e  polybori-0.8.2.tar.gz
5d3fb11901c5ab23e34ca3eefbf3028c  polybori-0.8.2.spkg
> mkdir orig; tar -C orig -xzf polybori-0.8.2.tar.gz
> mkdir spkg; tar -C spkg -xjf polybori-0.8.2.spkg
> diff --recursive -u spkg/polybori-0.8.2/src/ orig/polybori-0.8.2/
Only in orig/polybori-0.8.2/: M4RI

alexanderdreyer mannequin added this to the sage-5.1 milestone Jun 16, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin added c: packages: standard labels Jun 16, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin self-assigned this Jun 16, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin added the s: needs review label Jun 16, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

malb added s: positive review and removed s: needs review labels Jun 18, 2012

jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.1, sage-5.2 Jun 18, 2012

jdemeyer added s: needs work and removed s: positive review labels Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer added s: positive review and removed s: needs work labels Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer added s: needs work and removed s: positive review labels Jun 30, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin added s: needs review and removed s: needs work labels Jun 30, 2012

jdemeyer added s: needs work and removed s: needs review labels Jul 2, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin added s: needs review and removed s: needs work labels Jul 2, 2012

jdemeyer added s: positive review and removed s: needs review labels Jul 6, 2012

jdemeyer removed the s: positive review label Jul 7, 2012

jdemeyer closed this as completed Jul 7, 2012

sagetrac-stephen mannequin mentioned this issue Sep 6, 2015

Building polybori under FreeBSD #12818

Closed

ohanar mentioned this issue Jul 8, 2012

Polybori spkg: allow CC to contain multiple words #13040

Closed

alexanderdreyer mannequin mentioned this issue Jun 19, 2012

BooleanMonomial.index() SEGFAULT on constant monomials #13133

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Updating PolyBoRi to release 0.8.2 #13124

Updating PolyBoRi to release 0.8.2 #13124

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 16, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 16, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 16, 2012

malb commented Jun 17, 2012

malb commented Jun 17, 2012

malb commented Jun 17, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 17, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

malb commented Jun 18, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

malb commented Jun 19, 2012

malb commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

vbraun commented Jun 21, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 30, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 30, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 2, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 2, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jul 2, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jul 2, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 6, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 7, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jul 9, 2012

Updating PolyBoRi to release 0.8.2 #13124

Updating PolyBoRi to release 0.8.2 #13124

Comments

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 16, 2012

Current spkg

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 16, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 16, 2012

malb commented Jun 17, 2012

malb commented Jun 17, 2012

malb commented Jun 17, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 17, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

malb commented Jun 18, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

malb commented Jun 19, 2012

malb commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 19, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 19, 2012

vbraun commented Jun 21, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jun 30, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jun 30, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 2, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 2, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jul 2, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jul 2, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 6, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 7, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Jul 9, 2012