Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sylvester and Sims-Gewirtz graphs #14271

Closed
nathanncohen mannequin opened this issue Mar 14, 2013 · 17 comments
Closed

Sylvester and Sims-Gewirtz graphs #14271

nathanncohen mannequin opened this issue Mar 14, 2013 · 17 comments

Comments

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 14, 2013

As the title says. Two other graphs from http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/graphs/index.html

Nathann

CC: @dimpase

Component: graph theory

Author: Nathann Cohen

Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton

Merged: sage-5.9.beta2

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14271

@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin added this to the sage-5.9 milestone Mar 14, 2013
@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin added the s: needs review label Mar 14, 2013
@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

comment:2

Hello,

  • maybe add a link to :wikipedia:`Gewirtz graph` ?

  • the plots are random and not very nice

  • there should be two :: after SEEALSO

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 20, 2013

comment:3

Hellooooooooo !!

  • maybe add a link to :wikipedia:`Gewirtz graph` ?

Done.

  • the plots are random and not very nice

Yes I know, but I was not able to build one that I liked, so.. :-P

  • there should be two :: after SEEALSO

Done !

Nathann

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

Attachment: trac_14271-review-fc.patch.gz

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

comment:4

Hello,

once the bot is green again, and if you agree with my review patch, you can set a positive review

@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Mar 21, 2013

comment:5

OK, this one goes in first, then! Rebase the rest of stuff pending in age/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py.

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 22, 2013

Attachment: trac_14271-layouts.patch.gz

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 22, 2013

comment:6

Hello guys ! I improved my drawing scripts and ended up finding two nice layouts for these graphs. I hope that you will not mind my setting this ticket back to "needs_review", if only for a very short patch :-)

Nathann

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

comment:8

ok, looks better indeed. Back to positive review

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 22, 2013

comment:9

Thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanks ! :-)

Nathann

@jdemeyer
Copy link

comment:10
dochtml.log:[graphs   ] /padic/release/merger/sage-5.9.beta2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/graphs/graph_generators.py:docstring of sage.graphs.graph_generators.GraphGenerators.SimsGewirtzGraph:8: ERROR: Unknown target name: "http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/graphs/sims-gewirtz.html".
dochtml.log:[graphs   ] /padic/release/merger/sage-5.9.beta2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/graphs/graph_generators.py:docstring of sage.graphs.graph_generators.GraphGenerators.SylvesterGraph:7: ERROR: Unknown target name: "http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/graphs/sylvester.html".

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Work Issues: documentation

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 23, 2013

Attachment: trac_14271.patch.gz

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 23, 2013

comment:11

Apply trac_14271.patch, trac_14271-review-fc.patch, trac_14271-layouts.patch

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 23, 2013

comment:12

Sorryyyyyyyyy, I just updated it !

Nathann

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Changed work issues from documentation to none

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Merged: sage-5.9.beta2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants