New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feedback_vertex_set for graphs #14434
Comments
Attachment: trac_14434-move.patch.gz |
Dependencies: #14435 |
Work Issues: doctest |
comment:2
Attachment: trac_14434.patch.gz
|
comment:3
Did you by any chance install CPLEX or a LP solver which is not GLPK ? Nathann |
comment:4
Replying to @nathanncohen:
Nope. And patchbot neither. |
comment:5
Yep. Most probably because I am the one who installed it, and I did not remember Nathann |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:6
Updated. Sorryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Nathann |
Attachment: trac_14434-clean_doc.patch.gz |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed work issues from doctest to none |
comment:7
I update a patch with several corrections in the documentation. If you are happy, make it positive review. Two curiosities: I just learn that for verbosity, there is Why
instead of
|
comment:8
Yoooooooooooooooo !!!
Yeah... Right Pretty good idea... But this will require a LARGE patch I have one thousand different functions with a verbosity level, though most of them are LP-related. I wonder if it's a good idea to have a global function to do that rather than a flag for each function... HMmmmmmm
Because this is old code, written before integer values were automatically rounded. I will update this in a second. Nathann |
Attachment: trac_14434-doctest.patch.gz |
comment:9
Here it is ! Patch updated to fix a couple of .5 that remained. Could you give it a final check, and set the ticket to positive review if you agree ? Thanks for your changes to the doc ! Nathann |
comment:10
To twist the alphabetic logic of patchbot: apply trac_14434-move.patch trac_14434.patch trac_14434-doctest.patch trac_14434-clean_doc.patch Download |
comment:14
This breaks on some 32-bit systems, in particular arando (Linux Ubuntu 13.04 i686):
|
Changed merged from sage-5.11.beta1 to none |
comment:15
Is there a way for me to get access to this machine ? I really have no idea what's happening and I cannot reproduce the bug Nathann |
comment:16
Replying to @nathanncohen:
Ask Dima or Keshav. |
comment:17
Well... Guys ? Do you have any idea ? Nathann |
comment:18
Nathann, do you access to any 32-bit machine? Because this looks like a 32/64 bit issue, nothing particular to arando. |
comment:19
No I don't, and I don't see why this code would react to something like that either Nathann |
comment:20
It could also be a hashing issue, do you use a |
comment:21
Looks like it is a problem in Nathann |
comment:22
Replying to @nathanncohen:
I'll make you an account. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:23
Attachment: trac_14434-bugfix.patch.gz I'm an idiot Nathann |
comment:24
Attachment: trac_14434-ALL.patch.gz just to make sure that patchbot does not get confused, I removed "Or..." part. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:25
Apply trac_14434-ALL.patch |
comment:27
Good to go! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:28
Cool ! Thank you for the review Nathann |
Merged: sage-5.12.beta2 |
Apply :
Depends on #14435
CC: @sagetrac-tmonteil @videlec @dimpase @kini
Component: graph theory
Author: Nathann Cohen
Reviewer: Vincent Delecroix
Merged: sage-5.12.beta2
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14434
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: