You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be better to use the empty set as a set of generators for the unit group of Zmod(1) as well.
The main adaptation that this requires is that DirichletGroup(1).0 no longer works (this group is also generated by the empty set) and needs to be changed to DirichletGroup(1)[0].
The following choice of generators for two trivial groups is somewhat inconsistent:
It would be better to use the empty set as a set of generators for the unit group of
Zmod(1)
as well.The main adaptation that this requires is that
DirichletGroup(1).0
no longer works (this group is also generated by the empty set) and needs to be changed toDirichletGroup(1)[0]
.Depends on #17317
CC: @jdemeyer
Component: finite rings
Keywords: unit group
Author: Peter Bruin
Branch/Commit:
a38ab1f
Reviewer: Volker Braun
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17337
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: