Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement PowerSeries.inversion() as wrapper for ^-1 #17403

Closed
rwst opened this issue Nov 26, 2014 · 12 comments
Closed

implement PowerSeries.inversion() as wrapper for ^-1 #17403

rwst opened this issue Nov 26, 2014 · 12 comments

Comments

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Nov 26, 2014

People try to TAB-discover a method for inversion of PowerSeries but can't find it (http://ask.sagemath.org/question/24904/how-to-compute-the-multiplicative-inverse-of-a-series/), so we need a wrapper for ^-1, named analogously to PowerSeries.reversion().

The same applies to LaurentSeries

Component: commutative algebra

Keywords: inverse, series

Author: Ralf Stephan

Branch/Commit: 94b3ca3

Reviewer: Bruno Grenet

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17403

@rwst rwst added this to the sage-6.5 milestone Nov 26, 2014
@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Dec 31, 2014

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Dec 31, 2014

New commits:

6107bd217403: convenience wrapper inversion() for power and Laurent series

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Dec 31, 2014

Commit: 6107bd2

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Dec 31, 2014

Author: Ralf Stephan

@bgrenet
Copy link

bgrenet commented Feb 3, 2015

comment:3

The name inverse() instead of inversion() would be more appropriate to my mind, but actually I would say the same for reverse() rather than reversion(). This is more consistent with other names in Sage, such as derivative() (and not derivation()) or truncate() (and not truncation()).

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Feb 3, 2015

comment:4

I actually agree. If you open a ticket for reverse then I'll make this one dependent on it and do the development/deprecation work.

@bgrenet
Copy link

bgrenet commented Feb 3, 2015

comment:5

Replying to @rwst:

I actually agree. If you open a ticket for reverse then I'll make this one dependent on it and do the development/deprecation work.

This is now #17724.

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Feb 4, 2015

Changed commit from 6107bd2 to 94b3ca3

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Feb 4, 2015

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

94b3ca317403: rename to inverse

@bgrenet
Copy link

bgrenet commented Feb 4, 2015

comment:7

Looks good to me!

@bgrenet
Copy link

bgrenet commented Feb 4, 2015

Reviewer: Bruno Grenet

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Feb 17, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants