-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 452
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
wrong result of integral #21440
Comments
Upstream: Reported upstream. No feedback yet. |
comment:1
|
Changed upstream from Reported upstream. No feedback yet. to Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug. |
comment:3
Is the following example an instance of the same bug, or a different problem?
|
comment:4
Hmmm they look similar to me, although in your example the primitive computed by Maxima is correct, but for the case of the description also the primitive is wrong:
|
comment:5
I'm not sure
Note that:
|
comment:6
Well, the primitives given by various algo are all different:
and only "giac" returns a continuous primitive ! All the others have a jump at 1/2 |
Attachment: bad_primitives.png display of the bad primitives |
but it should be
1/4
:and
This was reported by Lukas Spiegelhofer on 8/10/2015 16:00:13 via "Sage Notebooks Bugreports".
Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug.
Component: symbolics
Keywords: wrong result, integration
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21440
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: