Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a function to get the canonical joinands of an element of a lattice #21597

Closed
jm58660 mannequin opened this issue Sep 26, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Add a function to get the canonical joinands of an element of a lattice #21597

jm58660 mannequin opened this issue Sep 26, 2016 · 10 comments

Comments

@jm58660
Copy link
Mannequin

jm58660 mannequin commented Sep 26, 2016

Add a function to get the canonical joinands of a lattice element.

Component: combinatorics

Author: Jori Mäntysalo

Branch/Commit: 1b5045e

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21597

@jm58660 jm58660 mannequin added this to the sage-7.4 milestone Sep 26, 2016
@jm58660 jm58660 mannequin added c: combinatorics labels Sep 26, 2016
@jm58660
Copy link
Mannequin Author

jm58660 mannequin commented Sep 26, 2016

Branch: u/jmantysalo/canonical-joinands

@jm58660
Copy link
Mannequin Author

jm58660 mannequin commented Sep 26, 2016

Commit: c9aa760

@jm58660
Copy link
Mannequin Author

jm58660 mannequin commented Sep 26, 2016

New commits:

c9aa760Add canonical_joinands().

@jm58660 jm58660 mannequin added the s: needs review label Sep 26, 2016
@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Sep 26, 2016

comment:3

You should include a test where it does not exist. Also, to be Python3 compatible, change iter.next() to next(iter).

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Sep 26, 2016

Changed commit from c9aa760 to 1b5045e

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Sep 26, 2016

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

1b5045ePy3-style next.

@jm58660
Copy link
Mannequin Author

jm58660 mannequin commented Sep 26, 2016

comment:5

Replying to @tscrim:

You should include a test where it does not exist.

There is one already: L.canonical_joinands(6) is None.

Also, to be Python3 compatible, change iter.next() to next(iter).

Done.

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Sep 26, 2016

comment:6

Replying to @jm58660:

Replying to @tscrim:

You should include a test where it does not exist.

There is one already: L.canonical_joinands(6) is None.

Whoops, missed that.

Positive review.

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Sep 26, 2016

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Oct 6, 2016

Changed branch from u/jmantysalo/canonical-joinands to 1b5045e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants