New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Workaround for failing complex_double test on Cygwin #21605
Comments
comment:1
#21292 remains stalled, but this simple test fix doesn't require it; better to just fix this. |
Changed dependencies from #21292 to none |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:2
#22759 solves the same problem in a different (arguably better) way. |
comment:3
Oh, that's new--I'll have a look. |
comment:4
I see now--this should fix the underlying problem I think, but I'll have to test it. |
comment:5
Since #22759, I think we can close this as a dup. |
Changed author from Erik Bray to none |
Reviewer: Erik Bray |
I fixed this a while ago, but realized I don't think I ever made a ticket for it.
This test fails due to minor numerical differences (again, probably originating in the
log()
function) so that the polynomial returned byz.algdep(5)
ends up being slightly different (it gets an extra factor ofx^2
). This makes the test a little more flexible to such differences.Component: porting: Cygwin
Branch/Commit: u/embray/bug/cygwin/complex_double_test @
77feef0
Reviewer: Erik Bray
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21605
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: